I don't really know what happens but it seems to be a big deal. I'm not even sure if it was Fox.
2006-09-26 23:15:32 · 9 answers · asked by starla_o0 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Well Clinton was asked a very blunt question by the Fox intervieiewer which was meant to entrap him to say something the right wing Bush administration could use. Clinton openly challenged his style of questioning and why he asked him this and not the right wing supporters supporters of Bush, who had been interviewed within the previous week and why was he doing the bidding of his right wing pay masters in the Fox corporation who were supporting and over protecting Bush. It was excellent viewing and good democratic politics which we have such a lack of.
2006-09-26 23:30:10 · answer #1 · answered by David B 1 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Mr. Clinton was asked did he do enough to connect the dots following the attack on the USS Cole in Yemen. At this point Mr. Clinton completely lost his cool and began practically shouting about how he tried hard to kill Bin Laden, and how the Bush administration did nothing in their first 8 months in office. Mr Clinton had ample opportunity to capture or kill Bin Laden. The Sudanese government offered to extradite Bin Laden to the United States, but Mr. Clinton refused. He is trying to deny this event ever happened, and basically rewrite his history, but there is a taped interview where he talks about this and plainly states he refuse the Sudanese offer. Now it was the position of the administration that terrorists should be handled as criminals, and if he believed this I can see why he would refuse. However, he doesn't get to change the facts now just because he is taking heat for his decisions. Mr. Clinton has yet again shown himself to be an insufferable liar, but true to form liberals will not take him to task for it. I for one am offended by his behavior. I do believe there are legitimate questions to be asked about how we are handling terrorism on a government level from both Mr. Bush and Mr. Clinton. but his current tactics are a political ploy to make democrats look strong on security and are just polluting the debate with more nasty rhetoric.
2006-09-26 23:32:05 · answer #2 · answered by Bryan 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Clinton went into a rampage because the common people, e-mails, wanted to know why he interfered 10 times and saved bin La den's life while president.
Clinton showed that He certainly believes that 9/11 in his fault.
He went into his usual finger pointing schedule, whenever he is caught lying. "Acting Mad", and putting on a show.
Once again, Clinton caught in the hen house, sucking eggs.
2006-09-27 00:39:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
He finally decided to defend his actions!! 6 years and Bush's answer is still Clinton did it!
2006-09-26 23:19:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anarchy99 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
he said that Bush should have killed Bin Laden when he had the chance and that there should be more troops in afghanistan not iraq.
2006-09-26 23:32:24 · answer #5 · answered by Alfred E. Newman 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Have a cigar
2006-09-26 23:18:25 · answer #6 · answered by bty937915 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
go to break.com
2006-09-26 23:18:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
he is a shameless pervert
2006-09-26 23:17:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
everything right
2006-09-26 23:16:48 · answer #9 · answered by St♥rmy Skye 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋