I thought it was more like jurassic park!!! long film, 1 hour to go to th eisland, 1 hour i nth eisland or more, and hardly anything of king king when he comes back to new york. the one from the seventies was much beter.
2006-09-26 23:01:44 · 11 answers · asked by Goldfish" 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
PAINFUL!!!! I was on a 10 hour flight to japan when i was watching it and i didn't think it'd end before i landed. it just caused me physical pain! WAY too long. ATROCIOUS acting and simply boring. Big Mistake, Pete! Big! HUGE!!
2006-09-27 03:19:15 · answer #1 · answered by Jacen_Jaina 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Peter Jackson's 'King Kong' was a true epic. Not as much as, let's say, Lord of the Rings, but it was great piece of cinema. It wasn't too long - The first hour was an examination of the characters; the sweet and innocent damsel in distress; and the no conscience film director, who will trample on anything in his way. For people who just wanted to see a gorilla smash some stuff up and kill loads of people then sure they're gonna be dissapointed because King Kong is alot more intelligent than that. It gives the audience credit; assuming that alot of people will find an emotional link to the poor creature that is 'King Kong'. However give credit to an audience; think that they have the slightest bit of intellect and you'll be wrong and they'll think your movie is boring or pick some hole in it, that isn't actually there. I have to retort on what someone said a few comments ago about how the girl screams 'don't kill him' because he destroys the city. You're an idiot! He's a bloody great big gorilla, who's been taken away from his home and he's pi ssed about it. The film shows that the humans are the monsters, not Kong. He has more humanity in him than the humans do. The movie is a love story between Kong and the girl; beautifully told, in a grand, epic way using the best of technology has to offer. 10/10.
2006-09-27 06:49:40 · answer #2 · answered by snooch 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was way too long. It could easily have been an hour shorter. If you want to see King Kong, get the original black and white one. It might not look as spectacular as the new one, and the acting is a bit more over the top, but it's a classic.
2006-09-27 06:11:13 · answer #3 · answered by Tish P 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I hated King Kong. It was just Peter Jackson trying to show off. Now that he won an Oscar, he thinks he's the greatest. Kong was over the top and could've shed an hour and a half. By the time the end came, I didn't care.
2006-09-27 12:52:48 · answer #4 · answered by Michael C 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I thought it was an ok job done on it. Great SFX, liked the bit with thhe insects on the island, but the ending with her going overboard with her love for King Kong was just creepy, bordering on beastiality (i almost called the RSPCA!)
2006-09-27 06:12:09 · answer #5 · answered by bagmouss 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I thought the recent King Kong movie was really long and boring. It wasn't a good movie, especially if your at the drive ins and your sitting outside your car. In winter. ...freezing...
2006-09-27 06:05:30 · answer #6 · answered by LYNCHY THE TALENTED 100% 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I though it was good, it just missed the spark of the lord of the rings films and there were quite a few loose ends here and there.
2006-09-27 06:24:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The most boring film I have ever seen...half watched I was too busy yawning.
2006-09-27 06:30:16 · answer #8 · answered by Tina 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I liked it but at the same time it made me mad. i don't get why the girl was yelling "no don't hurt him" and he was killing the whole city!!! That was pathetic. And was she in love with King Kong or what?
2006-09-27 06:06:39 · answer #9 · answered by xoxo 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
it a good movie fpr insominacs,put me to sleep
2006-09-27 06:03:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋