English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Science says 9/11 Was An Inside Job?

http://www.infowars.com

2006-09-26 22:38:58 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Other - Science

6 answers

Science says what?? Are you nuts?

A plane loaded with fuel that burns at 3000 deg. F slams into the building. Burning fuel (at 3000 deg. F) fills one whole floor of the building. Structural insulation never designed for that temeratur fails. Stuctural steel is then exposed to 3000 deg F flames. Structural stell begins to lose strength at temeratures over 750 deg F (THAT is a fact, look it up). Structural steel begins to fail. When a large enough amount of structural steel fails, the weight of floors above cause the entire floor to colapse down onto the floor below. This sudden impact overwhelms the supports on the floor below, and a chain reaction begins.
Fairly simple science, when looked at with the fact that the structural insulation was designed for a normal office building fire load (where temperatures seldom exceed 1000 deg F), not burning aviation fuel!

And you are an idiot if you believe all the goofy conspiracy theories!

2006-09-26 22:53:43 · answer #1 · answered by Star G 4 · 0 0

With certain reservations. I do not believe everything science says. Or scientists anyways; they constantly disagree and bicker. Science is not exactly an unimpeachable body of absolute fact, or "Ultimate truth". It is constantly changing, as more data comes in and researchers study it. And scientists have been known to change their minds. And of course lots of "science" is just speculation. A theory is just the best guess until a new one comes along that fits the known facts better, or new facts are discovered that elucidate or disprove older ones.

As for "9/11", I am not sure what you mean by an "inside job" (that the US government was behind it?), but that sounds like speculation to me. I have heard that before. Where are the facts that assumption is based on? That being said, I think it is a possibility that it WAS an "inside job". But I am a "conspiracy nut" of sorts, lol.

2006-09-27 06:48:38 · answer #2 · answered by harridan5 4 · 0 0

whilst science has it's place in defining our universe with logic, it is also, due to the restrictions/nature of logic, incomplete, and hence flawed.

try as you might, for some wierd reason, there are always going to be people who won't believe the facts that are right under their nose... they won't even begin to question. perhaps it is fear, perhaps it is stupidity, who knows, eitherway, their existance is fact.

2006-09-27 05:49:49 · answer #3 · answered by sofiarose 4 · 0 0

have a look at invariantology at http://wwf.edula.com

It is on the dissolution of science and philosophy.

2006-09-27 05:46:40 · answer #4 · answered by The Knowledge Server 1 · 0 0

Yes, it makes a lot of sense.

2006-09-27 06:55:49 · answer #5 · answered by ArgumentativeButNotInsulting 4 · 0 0

just look at loose change2ND edition u can see it at google video

2006-09-27 05:48:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers