English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The NIE report says Iraq has become a "cause celebre" for Islamic extremists, breeding deep resentment of the United States in the Muslim world. So Bush's Says His Own Intelligence Report is 'Naive'.

2006-09-26 21:21:51 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

15 answers

Thank God Almighty, they can only prop him up for another two years at best.

And the best news is, he has done so much damage to "The Party of Lincoln", it is far more likely the country will elect a democrat in 2008. Once this tyrant is gone, he will go down in history as the President who made the world safer (but only for Al Quada).

When Clinton took office, the deficit was $290 billion. When he left office, the SURPLUS was $230 billion.

Now,Bush has given us a deficit of $521 billion. That's not fuzzy math, just the facts.

And how about that great trade deficit of $68B.

HEY, SKYLOLOC, OR WHATEVER 3 CHARACTERS BELOW ME " He could wipe out his enemies in week' Tell that to Osama. He might have a slightly different opinion. But I assume you were joking. If not, you must be intoxicated, on illegal narcotics, or maybe you're not on your proper medication. Either way, I feel genuine sorrow for you and wish you the a speedy recovery.

2006-09-26 21:25:05 · answer #1 · answered by Kwan Kong 5 · 4 2

I laughed all through that press conference. Listen, let's keep Bush as president, at least then we get better comedy than any sitcom could provide.
He is really just too dumb to be on tv, it's a crime that he is.
Granted what he and Karzai said is true that terrorists don't need an excuse to hate the west they already did and it seems always will. However Iraq has just given them more of a cause, as if they really needed another one. What's worse it was totally unnecesary. but if you're Bush or Cheney and benefitiing financially from the war, then probably it is 'naive' to say anything that makes it look like going into Iraq wasn't worth it. I mean, what are you doing making sense, when you could be making millions in a pointless war right. Totally naive.

2006-09-26 22:31:56 · answer #2 · answered by stj 4 · 2 0

you really think that if you were running this country that you would bow down to the wants desires of intelligence gathering for civilians. propaganda rocks in wars and the public is better off looking the other way unless you want a lot of complications and things that go bump in the night near your pilot training programs on how to fly but not land again. this plot is far deeper than anyone president and is just out of the question to let 70 cells loose on top off the soviet bloc where abouts and it's implications are unknown, we have the bomb, we have the edge and we have the commitment
wait and see is the goal of the people who believe that the mind of Sodom was the evidence of a bomb directed at us to be of mass destruction, the evidence of what they want is the evidence they posses the threat of mass destruction and they will if you want put you on their mailing list and get us off the hook. their no free lunch out there, it not how will the man looks doing the job or what he says it's going to try Man's souls to bring wars to (lasting peace) everybody would be home now if wars had rules, there are no rules and i wish the people who don't like that idea would just send money for the war effort and not bother the brave hearts. the chivalry of mankind is on defense against world terrorists. do you not see the bar got raised not from the threat of mass destruction, but by the information that this is on going and is well financed with willing to die people and drug money to back it up and the intellgence says that the wars a just front to destract from even more sinester plots.

2006-09-26 22:04:56 · answer #3 · answered by bev 5 · 0 2

The Iraq Survey Group, apart from a few stockpiles, did not find the large quantities of weapons that the regime was believed to possess.

On December 14, 2005, while discussing the WMD issue, Bush stated that "It is true that much of the intelligence turned out to be wrong.


National Intelligence Estimate (a consensus report of the heads of 16 U.S. intelligence agencies) asserted that the Iraq war had increased Islamic radicalism and worsened the terror threat.


TO PRINCESS JANE: Bush better than Clinton?

In May 2006 a CNN poll comparing President Clinton's job performance with that of successor, President George W. Bush, a strong majority of respondents said President Clinton outperformed Bush on every single issue in question.

The poll of over a thousand random adult Americans was conducted May 5-7 by Opinion Research Corp. for CNN. Margin of sampling error was plus or minus 3 percentage points.

When asked which man was more honest as president, 46 percent favored Clinton to 41 percent for Bush. Respondents favored Clinton by near 3-to-1 margins when asked who did a better job at handling the economy (63 percent Clinton, 26 percent Bush) and solving the problems of ordinary Americans (62 percent Clinton, 25 percent Bush).

On foreign affairs, the margin was 56 percent to 32 percent in Clinton's favor; on taxes, it was 51 percent to 35 percent for Clinton; and on handling natural disasters, it was 51 percent to 30 percent, also favoring Clinton.

2006-09-26 21:31:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

Just wait till election time. The winds of change are coming and the Republican party is running scared at the moment. That's why there is so much dissention among their ranks.

2006-09-27 00:55:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

try reading to whole report and make a decision instead of the pick-and-choose left media bashing. Bush is doing a great job, at least he stood up to the terrorists, clinton just leaned back in his chair.

2006-09-27 00:07:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

As long as the democratic party can prop up Bill Clinton's penis for insertion. I'm sure he's still getting lots of practice at that. Oh, that's right the whole liberal world is naive and unwilling to accept that Clinton was just as "bad" a president as Bush. Taking up too much time defending his sexual life instead of running the country.

2006-09-26 21:27:04 · answer #7 · answered by Apple Pie 2 · 2 4

I wish it were just the Republican party that hold up this maniac, but there are others, many others, and they have MONEY, lots of Money. They like these wars and they wouldn't be happier if the United States were to take a big hit, hell have we not asked for it with our occupations and our senseless bloodshed. The powers that be are more than just the Republicans, they are Illuminated!

2006-09-26 21:43:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

Hopefully, not much longer. This monkeyman is a national tragedy.

2006-09-26 22:45:27 · answer #9 · answered by RELIGION 3 · 1 0

Until the end of his term in office. Not a moment sooner.

2006-09-26 21:24:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers