Could Bill Clinton have sorted out Osama bin Laden and Al Qaida when he was in office?

Answer 1

He bombed them once in 1998 after the bombings in Africa (and the Republicans cried "Wag the Dog")...He wanted to send troops in but he Pentagon refused. After the USS Cole bombing he didn't receive any real evidence of Bin Ladens involvement...that was given Bush and Bush did nothing with that info since he was too busy planning his vacation. In fact the Bush administration had a total of ZERO meetings about counter-terrorism before 9/11. Clinton formed the Bin Laden unit of the CIA (later disbanded by Bush) and the Clinton administration had bi-monthly meetings about counter-terrorism and a plan to get Bin Laden which they handed over to Bush. Bush went on vacation for eight months.

Don't blame Clinton for 9/11...it happened on do nothing George's watch a month after he was handed a CIA report titled "Bin Laden determined to strike in the U.S."...it's all in the 9/11 commission report.

Answer 2

Clinton could barely sort golf balls . With all the problems in the Clinton White House , Hillary took to laying the blame for all of it on a "vast right-wing conspiracy ". Bill Clinton brought back the good ole' "right- wing conspiracy" again-when Chris Wallace recently asked him about bin Laden . The two of them ought to go in to the "tag team " business as wrestlers . Take that dog & pony show on the road !

Answer 3

Osama was a threat, but not on the same scale as he became after 9/11. Al Qaeda, was just another of hundreds of terrorist organizations, and would have survived with another leader at the top, if Osama Bin Laden was removed.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing

Answer 4

the answer is quite glaring, yet some imagine in the different case merely because such an incredible style of contained in the thousands have not looked as if it would study the regulations of reason and effect. The movements of one president are what consequences contained in the present situation that the subsequent president ought to manage. The monetary device would not all of sudden replace even as a clean man or woman takes workplace and wars do no longer all of sudden look from nowhere without provocation. If bill had chosen to concentration on the global instead of himself, his public photo and his pocketbook (I gained't aspect out the different merchandise in his pants he concentrated on, i imagine anybody knows sufficient about that already), there's a reliable probability that a lot of what has got here about, and what the present president is compelled to manage, in no way may have transpired. "Clinton changed into attempting to capture Osama, if he had had "each and every of the probabilities contained in the global," i imagine he may have executed it." Ummm, no. judgements were in holding with public opinion and politics, no longer safe practices or needed movements. We did have approval to attack from the GOP, we had a objective on his forehead, and Clinton cancelled our astounding shot on the perfect minute because he had to divert interest to personal concerns to objective to maintain public help. it truly is a flat-out fabrication to say that the GOP had denied Clinton opportunities that we were confronted with to take him out. The information changed into there to carry him or take him out, besides because the approval from each and every side, and he botched it as a lot as income public opt for wondering it may in no way bite him contained in the butt.

Answer 5

yes, probably. His obssession over his standing in polls meant he was reluctant to take political risks for national security reason.

An interest article in the Washington Post shows that Clinton's statements to Fox News about OBL were incorrect. Here's the link:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/26/AR2006092600280.html?sub=AR

You can read article w/o registering by looking at www.bugmenot.
http://www.bugmenot.com/

Answer 6

Mr. I did not have sex with that woman claims he did not have evidence of Al Queda's involvement in all the other attacks against the US. He may have been right except for Osama himself telling him that he did it. His responce was always capture and bring them to trial. You will notice there have been no terrorist attacks against civilians since 9/11. This is because our president took decisive action against the terrorists and against one of their supporters. These people do not respect laws of our country. If we should be stupid enough to elect a democrat to the presidency in 08 I am quite sure we will be attacked again and again.

Answer 7

Yes covert operations was his expertise. In love or war you do not go screaming on rooftops what you are planning to do with the subject of your attention. Discretion is the better part of Valour and I am sure Clinton would have sorted them out.

Answer 8

I think he could have. because clintons approach is much better then bush's. he was liked more in other countries and nothing like this ever happened when he was in office, the moment bush stepped up with his vision to take over the world everything began going downhill hillfrom there............

Answer 9

The Americans couldn't catch Osama Bin Laden if they nuked Afghanistan, im surprised they can find their crack to give it a wipe.

Answer 10

Let's not be too hard on Mr. Clinton. After all, he was very busy training one of his interns to tend to his personal needs.