It sounds like you need to get a good hold of yourself _ but on the other hand ( which is also very probably, in rapid violent motion too) your public servants in either state may fall for it
2006-09-26 19:55:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Me 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Any unemployment you might collect for being laid off [notice i did not say fired with cause or terminated with cause since then you aren't eligible for unemployment] will come from a State fund that is paid into by your employer. So, if your employer is locatedin and paying into the fund in Kansas--like all good businesses in Kansas do-- then that is the fund from which you would receive any compensation.
2006-09-26 19:57:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by quntmphys238 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would say Missouri. Because after all you only pay state taxes to the state in which you live not the state in which you work.
2006-09-26 22:05:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by CorinneI 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
kansas
2006-09-26 19:56:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by changeling 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i would think kansas since that is where the employer is located
2006-09-26 19:53:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by hlizzy21 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you work you are employed, and therefore not eligible for unemployment. See how that works??
2006-09-26 19:49:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
kansas.
2006-09-26 19:56:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Where do you pay your taxes?
2006-09-26 19:49:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by L.lion 2
·
0⤊
0⤋