I've got a nice trade offered to me but I have to give up either Burress or Chambers. This is a keeper/dynasty league. I like Chambers better as a WR but I think Eli/Burress have the better upside tandom versus Culpepper/Chambers. Thoughts?
2006-09-26 16:12:01 · 10 answers · asked by Walman 1 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
I'd keep Burress. Just his size makes him a prime target everytime to get the ball.
2006-09-27 00:46:23 · answer #1 · answered by Southpaw 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Chambers is the better receiver. If Culpepper regains his game Chambers will look better than Randy Moss ever did. So will Culpepper remember how to play? Big,Big Question.
Burress has developed into a very good receiver since going to the Giants. Although Eli is a good QB, I don't believe Burress has as high a potential plus side.
Burress I believe will control his potential more that Chambers.
Culpepper at half his game will work for Chambers as well as Eli at the top of his game will do for Burress.
So this fully depends on Culpepper next year.And I wish I had the Crystal ball to know myself. The only way I can answer this question this year is if Any of the 4 of them have a season ending injury.
2006-09-28 15:03:49 · answer #2 · answered by The TANK 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Chambers is a better WR like you said, but teams know that and cover him every game and with Culpepper not getting the ball to him as much I'd go with Burress whos getting good catches when hes on point.
2006-09-26 16:21:02 · answer #3 · answered by Dave 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd take Burress in a heartbeat. Gotta have a QB to get the reciever the ball. Clearly Eli likes to throw to the dependable Burress. No Contest!
2006-09-26 16:16:03 · answer #4 · answered by caramel_velle 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Chambers is a future stud. If Culpepper can't get him the ball they'll find someone who will. Because it is a a keeper league, I'd part with Burgess. Plus, he's a bit of a head case that will never realize his potential.
2006-09-26 16:19:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It'd be helpful if you mentioned how many RBs and WRs you have to start. It makes a difference. In an 8 team league, I feel like you need quality at every position. But I wouldn't reach to get it though. In an 8 team league, giving up a 2nd and 3rd rounder for Brees and Fitzgerald is way too high. Keep Alexander and go fishing for another RB. Don't wait too long on QB, but you can't lose a 2nd rounder on Brees.
2016-03-27 12:36:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Burress went in hot water this wk with dropping and fumbling the last 2 wks, DC has not done nada this year. I would hold of on the trade for another wk if you can just to see if Burress gets some balls in wk 5 bye this wk , so if you can hold for 1 or 2 wks do it it is to soon to tell....
2006-09-26 16:19:05 · answer #7 · answered by robert n 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Chambers...He will come through soon with points. Plus you would be giving up loads of investment without giving him a chance to gel with Culpepper. Good Luck
2006-09-27 03:25:51 · answer #8 · answered by B C 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd keep Chambers. When your coach benches you for an entire half, and your team still comes close to pulling off a huge upset, like what happened to Plax, it's not a good sign. Go with Chambers.
2006-09-26 17:52:35 · answer #9 · answered by J. M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
chambers. first of all, burress is playing hurt. second of all, the synchronization between cullpepper and chambers is bound to get better. just look at chambers stats last year. and thats with horrible quarterbacks. just like last season, i believe the dolphins are bound to pick up momentum.
2006-09-26 16:16:36 · answer #10 · answered by red 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋