2006-09-26 14:23:56 · 17 answers · asked by RELIGION 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Why do you want to further the neocon's nazi-like agenda??
2006-09-26 14:57:43 · answer #1 · answered by special-chemical-x 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Israel may have to defend themselves before anything happens with Iran. The United Nations is doing next to nothing to stop Iran from thier goal of getting the bomb, all they are doing is giving them more time. Iran has stated they want Israel off the map. What is to stop them from trying? At the same time, we as the United States can not invade or start attacking Iran with out more proof or more no **** true intelligence. As much as Iraq needed to be invaded, we had faulty intelligence but we still needed to act rather than wait.
The enitre mid east is against Israel. They need to stay on thier toes and dont rule out them taking it to Iran if things continue to heat up. They are not going to, and should not, wait for thier country to get nuked. They will take the offensive when needed. We may aide them as thier allie when that time comes, but no one will just outright invade Iran unless they really do something blatent and stupid.
2006-09-26 21:37:52 · answer #2 · answered by Bucfan 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Should Israel attack Iran the middle east will explode into sectarian violence, with most muslim nations lining up against the "zionists" and the US. If US attacks unilaterally and Israel remains overtly neutral, the world will probably go along with the decision, provided we dont try to nation build like we are attempting in Iraq. Either way its a dangerous game.
2006-09-26 21:29:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
it depends on whether we want the oil fields mostly intact, since if we invaded that is the first thing we would protect like in iraq. If the israelis got a bug up thier britches and attacked i doubt they would be as nice, they couldnt afford to be they dont have much of an army numerically, cmpared to iran or the US, they would bomb the crap out of everything in sight, like we did in the good old days in germany and japan. Take no prisoners.
2006-09-26 21:36:47 · answer #4 · answered by rand a 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i think americans should think twice about what they say. i mean lets face it, you probably don't serve in the american forces but refer to an invasion as, should "we" invade such a country! respect your soldiers who put themselves on the frontline and get up off your fat *** and ask the question "should our soldiers invade iran or will they leave israel do it?" thats why your country is so hated, you people are too arrogant! your brains don't leave your countries borders!
2006-09-26 22:09:07 · answer #5 · answered by splodge3 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. Let Bush do the invading stuff himself this time! Pampers is making a diaper in his size to wear during combat
2006-09-26 21:26:29 · answer #6 · answered by JS 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Hit them from the sky, we needn't invade and 'spread democracy'.
2006-09-26 21:39:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
None of the above.
2006-09-26 21:27:25 · answer #8 · answered by planksheer 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We don't have anything to invade with ... sorry bout that!
2006-09-26 21:42:38 · answer #9 · answered by Pey 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I suggest we hit Iran, Israel hit Syria, and the UK hit N korea.
BING BANG BOOM!
2006-09-26 21:34:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋