After the fall of USSR, it became public knowledge that the Russians had developed a massive lunar rocket at the same time as America. However, it was a huge failure. They didn’t have such powerful engines, so the Russian rocket needed 32 engines, in contast to the American’s Saturn V, which had only five enormous engines. This meant that it was an enormous task to synchronise the 32 rockets at take-off.
Their giant booster ended up blowing up on the pad, and annihilated the whole complex – blew it all away. That was the end of the moon race for the Russians.
Don’t the moon landing deniers realize because of this how the Russians would have jumped on any chance to call the American effort a setup? They never did, even though they were beaten into the ground as far as getting men on the moon.
2006-09-26 11:55:58 · 6 answers · asked by nick s 6 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
On the contrary, they were happy to join up with America on the joint Apollo/Soyuz project that followed the cancelled Apollo missions. Why would they join up with an outfit that had faked a moon landing folks?
Moon landing deniers – please grow up. Read about it. Opinion without knowledge is not only the height of stupidity, but an evil thing.
2006-09-26 11:56:42 · update #1
Exactly! Even if NASA and other government agencies could have faked the six moon landing well enough to fool the general public, they could NOT have fooled the space agency or military intelligence types in the USSR. The Soviets were just dying to beat us. If the landings were faked, the Soviets would have re-engineered their N-1 booster and landed on the moon just prove what liars Americans are. Why didn't they? Because the landings were real and the Soviets knew it.
2006-09-26 12:26:44 · answer #1 · answered by Otis F 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I"ve been declaring fairly a lot an identical element because the late 70s. if reality be counseled that if the Russians even had an inkling issues weren't real that they had were surpassed the PR coupe of the chilly conflict. also given the actual shown reality that enormous numbers of non US owned radio telescopes global were used to song the undertaking and relay messages is somewhat truthfully forgotten through lots of the conspiracy nutters. Edit: to respond to Anastasia's question lower than: we've no longer been again as there is no favor to flow again. it really is too intense priced, its a negative experience, both the Russians and u . s . a . barbequed astronauts in injuries getting to the moon. NASA also has a restricted funds and it really is been spent elsewhere. the most likely next crew to land on the moon stands proud because the chinese, in round 2020 in accordance to modern bulletins through the mandatory authorities of China.
2016-11-24 21:07:05 · answer #2 · answered by turick 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well put!
Those that deny the moon landings occured are the lowest of the low.
Utter morons who's fevered fantasies have all been dismissed time and time again. But like anyone who's too stupid to recognize when they're wrong, they keep trying...
2006-09-26 13:23:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Opinion without knowledge is evil ? .. Hmmmm... I must disagree with this statement. I don't think that opinions are good or evil . They are just opinions. They may be informed opinions . . or uninformed. At least, that is my take on it. Good Luck ! :)
2006-09-26 12:00:28 · answer #4 · answered by tysavage2001 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You appear to be answering your own question - this strikes me more of a statement of opinion (not that I disagree with you) then it does a genuine posing of a question
2006-09-26 14:45:09 · answer #5 · answered by Strangerbarry 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because very few people speak Russian?
2006-09-28 10:20:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋