I think I read it is 4.7 which means that 95.3 of our country is working! You can blame bush for that. But shhhh don't tell the libs Bush has actually done something right. They will have a seizure or something. And anyway they will say it's a false number or that the jobs are low paying and don't mean anything. lol
2006-09-26 11:57:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by crusinthru 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
I know that he official numbers are very low. Keep in mind, tho, that once benfits run out, you are NO LONGER COUNTED as unemployed. Also, you are not counted if you didn't earn enough in your past employment to receive benefits or if you worked in an industry which doesn't have to pay benefits. Additionally, you are not counted if you have never had a job before and are looking. This method of reporting unemployment rates is NOT peculiar to EITHER political party, so don't come at me about any of your anti-liberal crap. The economic boom in this country is a fiction of someone's imagination. Actually, I think it's probably 10-15%, if the truth be told.
2006-09-26 12:16:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Chris is nice, the suggested unemployment cost has no longer something to do with human beings claiming or gathering unemployment coverage. first element to understand is it somewhat is a statistical estimate, it really isn't any longer absolutely the reality. An organization said as the Bureau of exertions records conducts a month-to-month telephone survey. They call something like 30,000 households each month, which ought to provide an fairly significant pattern (your usual Gallup pollseems frequently to survey about 1000 human beings.) Respondents answer one of those questions, oriented to determining one's employment status and no matter if or not they are contained in the exertions stress. someone is only contained in the exertions stress in the experience that they are both operating, or searching for paintings. The component of folk contained in the exertions stress, and actively looking for a job, yet who're unemployed, supplies you the unemployment cost. The very last variety did look unusually low. would nicely be an anomalous undesirable pattern. yet, understand that if sufficient human beings opt for to leave the exertions stress (as if retiring early, or they get discouraged and end searching for paintings, which defines them as no longer contained in the exertions stress), then that ought to diminish the unemployment cost too, without a lot progression in easily employment.
2016-11-24 21:06:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by turick 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
between 5-7 It's not really accurate as a lot of people never file for unemployment and it only tracks those who have been out of work 3 months or less.
The real numbers are probably 4-5% higher.
2006-09-26 11:55:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i believe its under 5%, one of the lowest in the world, we definitly don't have the unemployment problems that Europe has. My civics teacher was talking about it the other day in class
2006-09-26 11:48:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by THEBurgerKing 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
according to a wall street journal article the official dept. of labor figures are a complete guess and subject to political fudging (always kept on the low side to hide poverty ).
2006-09-26 11:56:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
4.7% as of August 2006.
2006-09-26 11:54:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Vagabond5879 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Latest I heard 4.7%
2006-09-26 11:50:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
about 5%,, compared to other nations like China at 9.8%
2006-09-26 13:15:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
between , 4.7%,United States, 4.6%
2006-09-26 11:59:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by File 2
·
0⤊
0⤋