I thought it was rather nice and fairly accurate. Bill Clinton, as much as I depise the man, IS IN FACT a brilliant politician. I do believe he is highly intelligent and I bet he'd be a blast at a cocktail party (crowded room only please). Bill O'Reilly also stated that he thought Clinton was a patriot. I don't know if I share that view.
I personally believe had he just admitted his affair with ML and said this is a personal matter between me and my family that would've ended it for me. What I can't get over is the lying again and again--he betrayed all Americans and I can't understand how Libs accept that and SCREAM LIAR to BUSH when he acted on BAD INTEL. That said, I believe Clinton's reaction in his Wallace interview was 25% sincere frustration and 75% deliberate calculation.
Thoughts?
2006-09-26 11:33:51 · 11 answers · asked by Cherie 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
There is no doubt that Clinton is a brilliant politician. A lot of sociopaths are charming and brilliant. They are very good at faking empathy and other emotions, but deep down they are only capable of thinking of themselves.
I do believe that Clinton was genuninetly angry, though. Chris Wallace said Clinton was very angry with his handlers after the show, and threatened to fire them if they ever put him in that position again (WHAT position? Being asked a fair question?).
Michelle Malkin also made a point that made sense to me. Clinton's reaction was a manifestation of a typical Clinonesque sense of entitlement. Out off all the interviews he did last week, Wallace was the only one who dared ask him a tuff question. The rest of the media drooled all over themselves, feeling lucky just to be in his highness' presence. The Clintons feel they are OWED the kind of treatment they got from most of the media. I think Clinton was sincerely indignant that anybody would, not only ask him a legitimate question, but didn't feel compelled to bow when he walked in the room, but that's just my opinion. Those who know him best say that everything he does is calculated. They might be right, but he's an accomplished actor, so we will never really know for sure if his rant was staged or not.
2006-09-26 11:49:26 · answer #1 · answered by Mike N 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
The only positive thing I can say about Bill Clinton is that compared to some of the radical liberals on this site, he seems conservative. Scary.
He lied under oath--a crime which undermines the heart of the judicial system--no small thing.
He revealed the hypocrisy of the left--NOW members and GLAAD, ACLU all supported him, even though they are supposedly against sexual harassment. Substitute a big corporate CEO for Clinton and see who would have been screaming.
He down-sized the military.
Yeah, what a patriot.
2006-09-26 11:39:31 · answer #2 · answered by ? 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
I stopped watching , O,Reilly,s program , quite a while back,
I started to suspect, He was more of a Democrat, just playing
as an Independent.
2006-09-26 11:41:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Ten different times we had bin Laden in our gun sights. Ten times Clinton pulled the plug and said: No.
This is being reported by his own people.
Should Clinton be thrown in prison and charged with treason? Or charged with stupidity?
2006-09-26 11:46:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
orielly hs been well known for not being judgemental to people, and everyone is entitled to their own opinion, I comend o'rielly for showing some restraint, I personally would have to restrain myself from telling clinton to drop dead.
2006-09-27 04:07:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
we monkey libs are scared of the true things you speak of! We monkey libs were saddened when that mean FOX man made our hero Bill Clinton cry
2006-09-26 11:39:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
why do you despise bill clinton? why don't you consider him a patriot?
he didn't betray anyone he wasn't married to. i am interested in what is being lied about, and that is why i am angrier at bush. i really don't care how great the clinton's marriage is, but i am interested in who we go to war with. if the president decides to act on intel, he must be held responsible for the results of that decision. even if the intel was bad... that is always a risk, which is why cia people aren't entitled to launch invasions off their own evidence!
2006-09-26 11:36:15 · answer #7 · answered by uncle osbert 4 · 1⤊ 7⤋
Yes, Praise me!
2006-09-26 11:48:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
How can a woman be a conservative? If it wasn't for a democrat, women still wouldn't be allowed to vote. Amazing.
2006-09-26 11:36:08 · answer #9 · answered by Neophyte 3 · 3⤊ 7⤋
Sorry I'm not a fellow conservative.But thanks for your views.
2006-09-26 11:40:02 · answer #10 · answered by hungerforknowledge 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋