false, abramoff from fund raising (Indian tribes) to congressmen and senators
2006-09-26 09:51:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by JM 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
That's an interesting question, actually. I'd say false. You could, for instance, ask a friend or acquaintance to slip the recipient some cash. Therefore, you didn't make the bribe directly. And I'm guessing there's probably more complex ways of issuing a bribe that I can't think of off the top of my head.
2006-09-26 16:57:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by David M 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
False, a bribe can be given through someone or thought of by multiple people, (A conspiracy), it can also have multiple recipients.
2006-09-26 16:53:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lottare 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
usually but this is not always the case. usually there is a middleman to do the actual exchange so as not to involve or draw suspicion to either the recipient or donor
2006-09-26 16:59:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have heard of third parties being involved in bribes.
2006-09-26 16:57:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by Special K 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not always. I could give money to a third party to give to a politician as a bribe.
2006-09-26 16:51:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by kingstubborn 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
false. the higher up you go the more likely it will be made by a third party.
2006-09-26 16:52:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by region50 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
True. They often are. False. They are not always.
2006-09-26 16:50:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
false
2006-09-26 16:51:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by *KiM* 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
true
2006-09-26 16:51:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋