He is an arrogant, self-centered flim flam man with no morals or conscience and seems to see the office of the Presidency as his own little plaything.
2006-09-26 09:45:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by brian2412 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Bush, Gore, Kerry... all monkeys. But some monkeys are better than others, and Gore and Kerry would have been bad monkeys. Why? Gore and Kerry labor under the delusion that they are the smartest person in the room, have all the answers, and are prepared to sacrifice you for what they believe (erroneously) to be the greater good. Bush knows he is not an exceptional man, and understands his limitations, so he doesn't try to govern the crap out of us, like his defeated opponents would have.
2006-09-26 16:51:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by presidentofallantarctica 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's very easy for people like you to sit back and make worthless remarks whether it be about the president or others. My question to you would be, do you have a better plan? What would you do if you had the weight of the world on your shoulders knowing that no matter what you did half would love you and half would hate you? Really, what would you do? People like you discussed me. All you do is show your ignorance.
2006-09-26 17:01:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by maxie 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Bad president
Secret energy meetings with civilians
Little effort to stop corporate corruption such as Enron
Stopped the Feds from averting the electricity crisis in CA
Tax cuts for the richest of the rich Americans
Record deficit spending resulting in a huge economic burden for the future.
Lied about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, and the link of Al Qaeda and Iraq, and invaded Iraq under false pretenses.
Failed to work cooperatively with the international community
Instituted prison camps in Gitmo that are illegal according to international law.
Failed to stop the prison abuses in Abu Garab.
Instituted a policy of torture in violation of international law and the Geneva convention.
Instituted a network of secret CIA prisons in several nations, so that prisoners of war could be tortured even worse than in the normal military locations.
Failed to aggressively pursue Osama Bin Laden
Failed to continue to assist and rebuild Afghanistan.
Had knowledge of Cheney's plot to divulge the identity of a covert CIA agent (valerie plame) as a reprisal to a report her husband issued that contradicted Bush's reasons for war in Iraq.
2006-09-26 16:51:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by a_blue_grey_mist 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
His name as Commander in Chief is President George W. Bush.
Your total lack of respect proves you either are a kid or you have no upbringing in proper behavior towards our President. You do not have to like him, my dislike started with President Kennedy (everyone did not love him until he died) & has come & gone, but
I always respect the office of president.
I do like & respect President Bush. I showed respect for a womanizer like Clinton when he was president. Clinton has continued to prove he is a liar. Those papers to prove he gave
"advice" to President Bush are being unclassified - once a liar always a liar. Unfortuanely, once a lack of respect is learned - well we know what it makes someone in business. Unemployable or an unbearable boss.
2006-09-26 16:53:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Wolfpacker 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
So you are looking to live in Venezuela or Iran is that it?
You have not supported your assertion with any facts or arguments. You simply dislike someone for reasons yet to be explained or categorized.
If you lived in any other nation, you would likely have half of the liberties and privileges that are defended by our government, our military and our national pride.
If you don't like the president, you can vote him out, which is more than you can do in Iran or Venezuela or N. Korea or Iraq or Afghanistan, before we went in there.
Please prepare yourself with sufficient reference and examples of incompetence before you go stumping for Bonzo the Chimp as our next Commander in Chief. It reflects more on your simean thinking than anyone else's.
2006-09-26 16:47:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by rohannesian 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
here is my opinion, since you asked.....i think in general all politicians are out to line their pockets and the pockets of those who will help them get what they want, their political affiliation is irrelevant. I do not assume to know what or how to be president, so there for I will not judge him. if you think you can do better, stop squawking and start running for office, if your words are as strong as you say, then maybe you can do a better job than our current monkey.
2006-09-26 16:48:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by NolaDawn 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well if you believe in evolution than monkeys are becoming people wait a few years and maybe he will be a monkey right?
2006-09-26 16:52:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by flavor cravin 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
A monkey would be better? Oh, are you considering running in '08?
2006-09-26 16:47:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think he is a bad president. I find him to be a closed-minded slave to the religious fringe of his party and to have a conflict of interest because of investments and connections his family has with Saudi Arabia. That and he's a big stupid head.
2006-09-26 16:45:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋