2006-09-26 09:40:11 · 27 answers · asked by janard 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Good luck
2006-09-26 09:43:58 · answer #1 · answered by a4140145 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It would be impossible. Despite what some have said it's no because of money either. The biggest hurdle would be religion. Can you imagine Islamic states allowing themselves to be governed by a christian president/prime minister or vice versa. Also things that happne in islamic states that they consider acceptable we would consider unacceptable and vice versa.
If the religion issue could be got past then you would have to work a way through the tribal mentallity that humans suffer from. Even in Britian there are those that would like Scotland to be an independant country. The basque sepratists in Spain want independance and so on. The list is endless. People want to be ruled by someone from their own country and no one would stand for a single world government. Even if it did happen it would only take months or even weeks to fall appart. Everyone would be looking at what everyone else had. There would be accusations of unfair treatment. Claims that certain areas got preferential treatment because the president was born there etc etc.
At the end of the day man kind is a tribal race and was never meant to live in such large groups. This is why we have local government, to make us feel that we have some control of local issues.
As for the god created on world without borders rubbish. If god created us then the problem is of his doing. If you believe in god, which i don't, then you must believe that we are only capable of what he allowed us to be. Our intelligence is his creation so he made us this way.
2006-09-27 00:51:03 · answer #2 · answered by PETER F 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are assuming that having one system and one law for every country would be the best solution to the problem of governance.
Nations are different from each other in terms of size, history, economy and other important factors. Therefore, it is more efficient to make laws locally as the lawmakers are familiar with the problems and customs of the area.
A centralised international government would be terrible at administration at the local level. However, there are some areas where international agreements are useful, and international institutions such as the EU or OPEC exist to deal with specific issues relating to large groups of countries.
I think the world is just too large to be ruled effectively by one government.
2006-09-26 10:07:24 · answer #3 · answered by robin p 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes it is difficult because of so many different things, and the first will be the cultural differences. What might it seem a good system of government for one country will not be to another one.
2006-09-26 09:57:02 · answer #4 · answered by betterlatethannever 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You must be young and Idealistic. The simple reason is that one is money and greed and power. Hitler tried to do this , Napoleon, Japan, and Romans. They all tried for world dominance. One government. The problem you have is you have 55 to1000 ways of governing. Who would have the power, what money system would you follow, and who would actually rule the people on the other side of the world. You have different religions and conflicts.. Yes it would be very difficult. that is why you have some many countries now. We all want have a piece of the pie.
2006-09-26 09:46:41 · answer #5 · answered by NIck N 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
We do it is called the United Nations and it was supose to work like state governments who are in subjection to the federal government. All the nations could and should belong and put in there 2 cents worth. Then the UN decides who is right and who is wrong. The geniva convention keeps us from tortureing each other and if we allowed our differences to be settled there we wouldn't have to be out on the battle field. That was the idea.
Some governments just are not cooperateing with the UN>
2006-09-26 09:46:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not only are there different countries, but different cultures, different faiths. Communism seems incompatible with Christianity. Russia had grown largely a nation without christians. Whatever government that rules has to be compatible with the beliefs and life styles of THe people and mores of the culture.
2006-09-26 09:54:33 · answer #7 · answered by longroad 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Er, yes! Very difficult. To kick off, Which system? What policy? Can you think of one that would acceptable to all?
2006-09-26 09:42:32 · answer #8 · answered by Avondrow 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I hate to tell you but that is what Bush and Blair are trying to do on the orders of the IMF, WTO and the World Banks and a mysterious secret society, the secret rulers of the world.
It can't and wont work.
2006-09-26 09:44:03 · answer #9 · answered by tucksie 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
That will be Ideal!...maybe one day in like 50-100 years...until they realize that God made the world without any borders...and it was meant to stay like that, until greed came along!
2006-09-26 09:43:48 · answer #10 · answered by Prncss 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋