That is exactly what Slick Willy and Hillary Clinton do professionally and politically ... they make any lie appear to be true up until Sunday night on Fox News !
That Silver tongued Devil, finger wagging, womanizing scoundrel, Slick Willy Clinton is only surpassed by Jimmy Carter who daily struggles with his "Dementia" and the DNC Court Jester Dr. Howard "The Buffoon" Dean! Can you believe he is a physician??!!
"I did not have sex with that woman" Clinton did it again in front of the whole world last night on FOX News and got caught in the act of being himself . . . a 24 karat phony!
Anyone with two (2) fingers of sloping forehead after last nights interview can see the abject lack of character this man possesses!
He is worried about his "legacy". But what he STILL does ot realize and can not change even if he did, is that his legacy is set in shame!
Inserting cigars in the Vaginal opening of a young intern in the Oval Office is his legacy, no matter what he says!
2006-09-26 08:51:44 · 22 answers · asked by B'klyn Barracuda 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He is defending himself so vehemently because he can get over the Monica-gate crap with time; his mishandling of OBL is something that can ruin his legacy. He was almost Reaganesque in his ability to not get blamed for his wrong doings (except for staining the dress and lying about it.)
2006-09-26 09:00:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 4⤋
the single which did it? it really is been shown that there have been diverse human beings lower than diverse managers through the IRS that were doing this. this isn't a small one man or woman scandal. it truly is large. They weren't declaring that Obama ought to admit that the scandal occurred. They were declaring that Obama ought to admit that he knew it changed into occurring. Who watches a million min on a information channel and then spouts off about a obviously opinion commentator (they are on all information channels) as even though it changed into meant to be a authentic information phase? Or can not liberals tell opinion commentators from easily new commentators? that would clarify plenty.
2016-11-24 20:43:51 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I saw that even an ex-president can finally have it UP TO HERE with the far right and this Never-Never-Land they're all living in while they've sent the entire Country and everything we hold dear and honorable right down the River Styx.
You want to talk about a lack of character? Might as well hurl ethics, honor, credibility, accountability, compassion, and patriotism in there as well. Bill Clinton is so far ahead of Mr. Bush and Cheney in every one of these categories that it's like comparing Nathan Hale to Benedict Arnold. History will be very kind to Mr. Clinton, and his best might be yet to come. MonicaGate will not even make it to an embarrassing little footnote, except to show how far the far right was willing to go in their hypocrisy.
George Bush will undoubtedly go down in history as a total failure, a thief, a congenital liar of the first order, and a traitor to everything America is supposed to stand for. He will be called "the American Hitler" in our great-grandchildren's history books, and the people who enabled him and offered him aid and comfort will be portrayed as the Nazis they are.
George Bush and his army of half-witted, mindless Thugs are truly the darkest chapter in our two-hundred-thirty year history. And the worst is yet to come.
I'm no democrat. But I will be voting for them. From now on.
2006-09-26 09:32:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Well, this is the 5th posting of the same nasty comment about one of the greatest presidents this country has ever had.
And Bush's legacy will be his war on terror by fighting the wrong country. He was close tho'. Only one letter off.
Oh- Clinton just raised $7.3B to combat global warming. I guess he's just doing this because he wants more sex with interns?
And he just got back from a trip to Africa where he raised money for vaccines and public health issues there. Yeah- that phoney. He's just saving the lives of 100's of thousands of people because he's trying to cover up what a lousy guy he is.
2006-09-26 09:02:48 · answer #4 · answered by Morey000 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Here are the facts. Clinton got a ******* but isn't our president. Bush has done much much worse including killing of Innocent lives. The biggest character difference between the two is Bush has people lie for him. Clinton doesn't. I will vote for Hillary.
2006-09-27 02:44:28 · answer #5 · answered by Karrien Sim Peters 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yikes. I don't give Clinton a lot of credit for arrogantly defending his own record instead of saying, "hey I've gotten with Dubya and we've talked and we're going to make sure any mistakes made will not happen again.". Still there's a few good things in the man's legacy. Let's not get out of hand.
2006-09-26 09:00:11 · answer #6 · answered by MEL T 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
> On FOX News The World Saw Slick Willy Clinton's First
> Stages of a Mental Melt-Down! What Say You?
Try again, chump. FUX had to edit the interview to make Clinton look bad. For anyone who wants to see it as it REALLY went, visit
Reich Wingnuts like yourself are in jealous agony because Clinton could answer the questions without help or protection from handlers. Chris "George" Wallace tried the standard christinazi tactics of constant interruption and changing the subject, but Clinton had the guts to stand up to Wallace's lies and cowardice.
Wallace accused Clinton of doing nothing about the USS Cole, and Clinton said, "When did FUX news ask any of the Bush Junta the same question?" Wallace, typical reich wing chickensh!t that he is (like the chickenhawk who asked the question here), NEVER answered Clinton's question.
Here are the facts:
- Dickless Cheney was on FUX *six* times and was never asked.
- Cumdolleeza Rice was on *twenty* times and was never asked.
- Rumsfeld was on *nine* times and was never asked.
- Several others of the illegitimate Bush regime were on numerous times and were never asked.
Clinton was on once and was interrupted when he tried to answer. Fairly unbalanced, I'd say.
Later, Wallace *LIED* and said Clinton was "rude" backstage, but had no tape to back up the accusation. (Of course, Clinton will never be allowed back on to rebut that lie....) Typical reich wing FUX news, they live of to their forebears:
"It's easier to tell the lie than it is to refute it."
- Hermann Goerhing
> Inserting cigars in the Vaginal opening of a young intern
> in the Oval Office is his legacy, no matter what he says!
The Chimp wants to legalize torture and rape of prisoners, and you're worried about consentual sex?
Why not sign up and go to Iraq if you believe in the cause, you chickenspit chickenhawk? Cluck cluck cluck....
Answer one question, chickenspit: Why didn't Shrub do anything about the USS Cole in eight months? Shrub was president from January-August 2001, NOT Clinton.
.
2006-09-26 09:27:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Did Clinton's Fox interview help the democrats in anyway shape or form ,
No
All it did was allow the wing nuts on both sides beat on there chests ,and say how great they are .
2006-09-26 09:17:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Thumbs down!
2006-09-26 09:18:18 · answer #9 · answered by thumbsdowndevil 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Never really though he was DUMB, just SLICK. Something we don't need, and the rest of the world won't respect, is a SLICK President of the United States.
2006-09-26 08:58:46 · answer #10 · answered by senior citizen 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋