whats your opinion about separation of church & state?

Question

i'm doing a report.

Answer 1

Seperation of Church and State is supposed to keep the government from creating a state or nation sponsored church, not to keep any church out of the government. Did you know that this phrase is not in the Constitution? Check out the below link to learn the truth behind the story that the ACLU has warped to their anti-God view.

Answer 2

It is a concept written about by Thomas Jefferson which simply means that the US should never have a state church like the Church of England or the Catholic church as it is the state church of Italy, Spain, Portugal etc.

Some folks think that it means that no one can even express religious ideas or even pray as a public employee or public space. This concept appears NOWHERE in the constitution. That Christian men living 200 + years ago in a country founded by Puritans too stupid to even be considered a joke.

Answer 3

Letitcoun took my answer. Which is the right answer. But not the popular answer of today. If the notion that the founding fathers wanted to separate Christianity from government then why do they open every session of congress with a prayer? No one is trying to push any religion on anyone else. And anyway what is so harmful about asking guidance from a higher power? Or haveing the ten commandments as guidelines? Unless you think things like thou shalt not steal are harmful to your way of life.

Answer 4

It's a fact. Jefferson said so and that's good enough for me. I personally see it as a two way street: no religion intruding into our government and no government intruding in religious observance. However, in the last election, churches around here had signs up advocating a referendum to ban alcohol sales on Sunday. Now that's going over the line. If a pastor recommends a candidate, that's also over the line. Churches are getting mighty ballsy these days.

Answer 5

in case you do not separate church and state, which church wins the prize of being linked with the state? Hmmmmm, Mister? america of united statesa. change into no longer in protecting with faith--you have to be taking under consideration Anglican England, which our forefathers got here the following partly to get remote from... or you're wondering about the Puritans who setled the following earlier there change right into a u . s . of united statesa., and they were as undesirable because the freaking Taliban. it really is what the structure says: Congress shall make no regulation respecting an institution of religion, or prohibiting the loose exercising thereof; or abridging the liberty of speech, or of the click; or the right of the folk peaceably to deliver mutually, and to petition the authorities for a redress of grievances. Congress shall make no regulation respecting an institution of religion. Anotherwords, they shall no longer extablish one faith as a state faith. You call this a "Christian us of a" and that is precisely what you're doing, do not you note? You rattling confident doesn't like it if passages of the Torah or the Koran were used solely in our courthouses--and do not lie and say you'll. whats up, you oughtta supply Gil S the ten factors. i do not understand him/her from a hollow interior the wall, yet what an informative and nicely-presented answer!

Answer 6

It's not separated ENOUGH!
This is from the "Treaty of Tripoli" (1796-97):

Art. 11. As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.

If you don't believe me, Google it.

Answer 7

Necessary, but misunderstood. Before the headscarf ban in France, teachers in public schools already could not wear headscarves because they were representatives of the State. We need to remember that the state is run and made up by individuals from various cultural groups. Those individuals need not and should not have to shed who they are in order to be a part of governmental culture. A government democracy should be intermingled with people from all walks of life trying to influence and contribute to society according to their best judgments. Of course, American ideals of respect and a degree of tolerance should be upheld.

Answer 8

It is bad enough when a church runs a nation .Even worse when one of the followers run it .
I do not believe in religion or any of the prophets from moses to David to Mohammad .
It is simple to see that one must die for ones belief's when following the teachings of religion .
Had the rules never changed i might have been more accepting of religion but it changes with time as does its followers .
Keeping all religion out of government means we never fight a holy war if such a thing exists .
We fight for land and wealth . For freedom and protection .
We teach no religions in school or have prayers in congress or for war .
We need to see the religious for what they are .Weak mentaly unstable people with out rational thought to guide there decisions.
Religion makes fools of us all not just the believers if it is in our government .
Not all men believe in religion and the only reason many men do is to apease the wifes .

Answer 9

ITS THE MORALLY RIGHT THING TO DO.

ALWAYS WAS.

My tax dollars do NOT go to fund a historically inaccurate crucifix and a historically inaccurate bible.If I told one reactioanry how to live their life they'd have a fit.And forcing religion onto other people is a mask to hide the conservatives stealing and corruption anyway.

Seperation of church and state is the reality.Imposing a religous dreamworld on others is the fallacy.Common sense dictates you
MUST constitutionally uphold Freedom of Religion.

Including Freedom From Religion,for goodness's sake.

Answer 10

The conservative, Christian extremists are trying to do the same thing that the conservative, Islamic extremists have done in the Middle East in their countries. Both Christian and Islamic extremists try to integrate church and state so they can try to impose their beliefs on everyone else. Both religious groups try to blur the line between church and state.

The integration of church and state is very, very dangerous and we should stop it at the root. Religious extremism isn't just in Islam, it is in Christianity just as much.