Do you think Europe and Asia should be considered one continent.?

Answer 1

Not really. Culturally, they're not one continent. If you don't think there's a cultural difference between Germany and Vietnam, you're kidding yourself. I can see where the distinction could become blurred, though, particularly in certain regions of the former Soviet Union. The term "Eurasia" wasn't coined for nothing.

Answer 2

the idea of a continent has a truly temporary definition. it truly is often considered one continent and called Eurasia. even as they are defined one after the different there are 2 known causes given. a million) on the dividing line there's a mountain determination that isolates the areas from one yet another. 2) below the technical definition of "separated by water" there's a small river and bypass device that does (kinda) separate both land thousands, a minimum of seasonally. The streams are merely too small to look on maximum interior of sight or global maps. even as there's a cultural divide on the mountain determination through isolating aspects, it would not truly ought to do with racial words like "whites" and "Asians" because it truly is a terrible line for isolating human beings by pores and skin shade (see parts that fall into both continents like Russia or Turkey, and shade alterations between South West and East Asia).

Answer 3

Yes I do, regardless of the cultural differences. Continents are usually defined by their geographical characteristics: large land masses that are separated from other land masses by water.

Answer 4

I agree with thaliax. I also think the two areas have had so many rivalries throughout history due to those cultural differences-it would be wrong to group them together.

Answer 5

yes, but if we did that north and south america would be one continent as well.

Answer 6

No, I like it the way it is.

Answer 7

i do because it is possible

Answer 8

No!