Sorry about the weird question, my dad wants to know. Why? Don't ask.
2006-09-26 07:00:52 · 14 answers · asked by Rosie 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
The Geneva Convention specifies treatment of prisoners of war. It does not spell out what torture is.
I'm pretty sure you can specify bathroom break times without crossing the "torture" line.
2006-09-26 07:06:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
there have been more beneficial than Cheney inquisitive about this , and torture isn't 'perfect' or "left' is somewhat desrtuctive , inhuman , the Geneva Conventions truthfully limit it! That the united stateshad to diminish its standarts , is beyong comprehension. Admissions of something lower than torture are not to any extent further truths we are able to relay on. Sorry i dont trust contained in the interest for an eye fixed , bologney>
2016-11-24 20:32:02 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Geneva Convention doesn't specifically define torture.
2006-09-26 07:02:53 · answer #3 · answered by MEL T 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No it is not classed as torture unless they sew your privates up as otherwise you can pee in your panties. It probably comes under humiliation, and that is covered by the Geneva Convention
2006-09-26 07:04:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Basic human needs have to be met with prisoners of war. Going to the bathroom is a basic human need. I would think it would be a form of torture.
2006-09-26 07:10:31 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes that is considered torture how would you like it if they shoved a plug up your #2 and a catheter up your #1. how long before the pressure would become so agonizingly painful you would say anything they want to hear. Thus it is quite illegal .
2006-09-26 07:08:33 · answer #6 · answered by brian L 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know about the Geneva convention,but school students go through that everyday.If they call it tourture,then let the lawsuits begin!
2006-09-26 07:04:58 · answer #7 · answered by windy 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes it is ,also not having privacy in that area is a form of torture....
2006-09-26 07:14:50 · answer #8 · answered by bereal1 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, its not a covered issue, and I know from my days as a Marine that in a red line brig, one can be denied that priviledge.
2006-09-26 07:29:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Maybe not torture but humiliation, especially if you end up going in your pants.
2006-09-26 07:05:35 · answer #10 · answered by Double 709 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋