You people make me sick. You bash Bush over and over and over and over and over and over and over and, well, you get the picture, but you have NO REASON as to WHY you hate him so much! You call him a terrorist, you compare him to Hitler, yet you cannot prove any of it. Bush is not the one that drove 2 planes into the WTC. Bush is not the one that wants everyone who doesn't believe what he believes dead. You need to wake up and smell the roses. WE WERE ATTACKED! Everything that Bush has done and is doing has been in response to 9/11. Here's a question: where are all the terrorists going right now to fight the USA? That's right, Iraq and Afghanistan. Where would they be going if Gore had been president on 9/11 and just complained about it to the UN? They'd be coming to the US to carry out more attacks against us. THAT is what this war is all about, it is to keep you shriveling nay-sayers safe from the real threat while our service men and women take the brunt of it. So the next time you want to call this a war for oil, ask yourself, how many terror attacks have happened in the US since 9/11? You all need to go get facts on your side before you just run around spouting off your mouths. That will never happen though, because you just hate Bush blindly, and no facts will stop you from calling him all kinds of ignorant things. So go ahead, call him a terrorist if you want, but I call you a fool that can't think for yourself.
2006-09-26 08:34:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by letitcountry 4
·
1⤊
5⤋
Well let's see-- Nobody LIKES the terrorists. No, not even Libs, contrary to what cons say. We don't want to blow up bush or cons-- there are disagreements, so what, don't be so whiney.
We DIDN'T elect terrorists.
Terrorists aren't implementing programs to violate the constitution or our privacy as a governmental action.
We have no control over the terrorists organizations nor do they necessarily have one leader other than UBL (for that matter, we have little control over the gov too)
The gov is supposed to be accountable to us (the citizens). Terrorists are not.
The gov, not the terrorists conciously decided to go into Iraq and failed miserably. The gov is also spending billions (eventually trillions) of OUR money in that ill conceived action.
So you don't like liberal values huh?
- So I guess freedom is not one of them?
- How about fairness in people's daily lives- jobs, housing, etc.
- How about ensuring somebody watches corporations to ensure they act approiately?
- How about safety items or caring for the environment?
- How about keeping government out of our personal lives?
- You looking to collect social security?
- Would you ever collect unemployment if you were out of work?
- How about quality of the food you eat?
These are all liberal values that have been shared by D and R leaders throughout the history of our country. You're focusing on the wackos not reasonable libs.
Why is it that you cons aren't willing to hold your own party accoutable? Your party IS supposed to be the one that is all about personal responsibility. How about eating some of your own cooking for a change?
2006-09-26 06:41:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by dapixelator 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
Polititcs of today are actually much milder than in the 1800's when there were Gentlemanly Duals I seem to remember from history books... People today get there information in sound bites. For instance one news channel will report on something and leave out imporant facts that change the whole story... Thats why as a country need to keep informed. But then many of us hardly remember Yesterday much less what was taught in school or for that matter current events...
2006-09-26 07:02:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by Scott 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm confused...aren't WE the terrorists? Becuase that is what the right would like you to believe...republicans comparing democrats to terrorists and even Hitler! And you wonder why we defend ourselves? As long as Bush tear s apart our constitution in the name of fear, the terrorists have won. So ask yourself AGAIN, who's side are you on? I'm on the side of freedom, liberty, and the US constitution. Besides, I'm guessing you have LESS conversations with terrorists than you do with liberals. Or maybe you don't. ' Find Bin Laden.' Another left wing smear campaign against the Bush administration? Or a plea to find those responsible for 9/11?
2006-09-26 06:35:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by hichefheidi 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
If you truly understood the liberal perspective, you wouldn't ask such an off-target, rhetoric-intense question. For the last time: Liberals do not support terrorists! They do, however, have the guts and conscience to recognize that Bush's war on terror is a façade. And they have the backbone to confront the hypocrisy. If nothing else, the Iraqi war has proven beyond a doubt that you cannot fight terrorism with military might. Terrorism is fought with strategic police investigation and a cooperative, worldwide network of intelligence. Did the British thwart the plot to hijack several commercial airliners with their military or with intelligence?
Furthermore, Bush continues to proclaim that "we're fighting them over there, so we don't have to fight them over here." What a load of crap! Explain to me how our occupation in Iraq prohibits terrorist acts in America or anywhere else. Terrorists dwell in every country on the planet. The war in Iraq does not restrict their activities in any way. Get off the merry-go-round and face reality.
2006-09-26 06:56:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Hemingway 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
bush is bashed because he has no idea of what's going on or what he's doing. the man is a retard and every question that he is ever asked is scripted and he only answers question aproved by his handlers, why does he need handlers? to protect him from his own stupidity. liberals dont hate the presidentcy, the hate the man: george w. bush. he spends more time on vacation than at work. anyone else doing this anywhere else would of been fired a long time ago. liberals also hate the terrorist what they dont like is this administrations way of handling things. labeling everyone that's not caucasian a terrorist. and once you're labled a terrorist you lose all your right's.
2006-09-26 06:37:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by bosox_fan_04 1
·
3⤊
1⤋
Liberals are against conservatives more than the terrorists?!...(sigh) Look, can you post real, logic based questions that incite true debate and discussion, or are you only capable of this hyperbolic, insane, inflammatory crap? You don't seem interested in real discussion or investigation, only lobbing mean spirited accusations. Why are you asking the question when you've already made up your mind? Seems pointless to me, I guess you're just bored and looking for a pissing match.
And to imply the liberals hate Bush more than terrorists because they criticize what they perceive as failures of his administration is ludicrous and hypocritical. Are you going to say that when Clinton was in office you refrained from criticizing him because he was president? And don't say it's different because we are at war now, we were at war with Clinton in office, as well, and I'm sure you showed no restraint then, just as you seem to be incapable of it now.
2006-09-26 19:13:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by wendy g 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Bush breaks the law. Terrorists break the law.
Terrorists get punished for breaking the law. Suspected terrorists get punished whether they've broken the law or not. Bush gets to break the law without being punished.
In other words, the law doesn't matter any more under the Bush regime. So, if we don't respect or follow the law anymore, what are we fighting for?
2006-09-26 07:57:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
You know what I questions like these really rub me the wrong way! Look at all of the problems this one man has brought upon not only this nation but the families of soliders that will never return back home again. Bush is a Terrorists in my eye's, he is not short of that! This whole war for Bush is nothing but a pointless power trip thats caused this nation to much unwanted pain and trouble. Who new one bad apple could spoil the whole bunch.
2006-09-26 06:39:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by CrystalTears 1
·
5⤊
1⤋
Because You & Bush bash liberals more than You bash
terrorists.
Why are the conserves hell bent on dividing this country?
You're doing exactly what the terrorists were hoping for.
2006-09-26 06:37:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋