what is social inequality and social injustice ?

Answer 1

Social inequality is an (in principle) objectively observable and measurable phenomenon. In any particular society, some group of people has sole, more, or easier access to a perceived boon than some other group. The difference of access may be overt, as under apartheid in S Africa or when the caste system is strictly applied in a Hindu society; or covert, as with the class system in Britain.

For example, if fees are charged for education, those who have more money have more access to education than those who are economically poorer.

Social injustice is a political construct. "Injustice" is relative to the concept of "justice" held by an individual or as interpreted through the laws of a society and their enforcement (or non).

Answer 2

There has consistently been earnings inequality interior the U. S.. that is in easy terms interior the final hundred years that a center type has come into being, which for some reason we equate with a populist democratic fable land, that it has consistently been and so shall stay. the wealthy have lots longer suggestions, and fairly enjoyed the time while there become no center type, no public faculties (europe has each and all of the practise that wealth could have sufficient funds to the better type offspring), and a worker type held captive between low salary and indebtedness to the enterprise save on one hand, and utter privation and starvation on the different. could we rob from the nasty previous one percenters and throw the funds to the nasty previous welfare recipients? No, that is overly simplistic twaddle from the two factors. What we could consistently do is have an clever communication. the latest unfair disparity of earnings comes promptly from the unfair disparity of capital features tax while in comparison with earnings tax. that's the grimy secret that the liberals are too stupid to talk approximately and what the conservatives are too sly to develop. as long as the two factors shop the smoke and mirrors in place, the significant conversations in no way could take place. Capital features tax could gain parity with earnings tax to make a truthful enjoying field the place ordinary paintings reflects ordinary earnings, even saint Ronnie Regan knew that, even no count if that is now blasphemy to declare it. Cheers. Edit: The solutions indexed right here are a proper occasion of why we won't be able to have an clever communication on the subject count. The vitriolic stereotyping that maximum decrease earnings conservatives characterize with the aid of fact the beginning up of the undertaking purely tutor their bias against minortities and those poorer than themselves, on an identical time as on the comparable time insulating the real reasons from public view. that is extra of the (unwitting) smoke and mirrors that shop the real themes from being suggested.

Answer 3

haha. I've seen all of your questions. Looks like somebody better go find a Soc. 101 book fast!!