Yeah thats what our beloved leader keeps telling us.Constitution we don't need no stinkin constitution. I think thats what he said the rest of the conversation was classified for our national security.
2006-09-26 05:26:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by djmantx 7
·
7⤊
1⤋
A strange thing about life in the Tomb is. The Skull&Bones gives privlege to Alumni. The mission statement from the beginning was to select the top 15 Freshmen. And the sons of previous Bonesmen.
The problems is best explained by Solomon. The curse of a wise man is that he son could be a fool, as easily as any one else.
George W is techenically a high functioning moron, with a IQ in the mid 80's He would have never been selected to join the Skull&Bones with that low intelegence level. But his Grandfather and father are Alumni.
2006-09-26 12:42:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by Skull&Bones 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
I'm assuming from your question you have yet to read the Geneva convention and saying that, this removes any credibility you may have once had.
The Geneva convention applies to and only to UNIFORMED combatants. these people were not uniformed and could easily be executed for being a spy, in accordance to the Geneva convention.
2006-09-26 12:31:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Moral high ground saves few lives.Better a tortured killer than massacred citizens.Or is that to straight forward for you to follow?
2006-09-26 12:35:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Tommy G. 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes and if it doesn't just have Fox news blaim Clinton and focus on his behavior and not the answers and all we be forget about the current administraton for dropping the Ball of Terrorism!
2006-09-26 12:24:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Karrien Sim Peters 5
·
2⤊
3⤋
i don't think the terrorist are covered under the geneva convention or the US constitution.
sounds like they are sol.
2006-09-26 12:26:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by more than a hat rack 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Only when morality is defined by Adolph Hitler.
2006-09-26 12:25:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Rja 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
no, thats the "civilized world" that bush reffered to ...
2006-09-26 12:27:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It was good enough for ROOSEVELT in WW2 , why not now ?
OOPS!
ROOSEVELT WAS A DEMOCRAT, THAT MAKES IT O.K. !
2006-09-26 12:25:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
As compared to what?
2006-09-26 12:24:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋