much worried about to take back the loan given to poor countries with hidden agenda without knowing the real problems of the poor people of the particular country or not bothered about them also .In turn the poor countries get temporary relief and long term burden.
2006-09-26 05:22:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by adraya 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
imo it works on the same principles, and indeed is run by the same international bankers, as the federal reserve. enslaving the countries of the world to debt while the few elite that run it at the top bask in the profits of interest produced by fractional reserve banking and guaranteed by the taxes of the populations.
2006-09-26 05:18:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
both good and bad, but more importantly, it could do better.
If basically forces nations to redirect their economies to its standards, and then undermines that very same effort by its programming in neighboring countries.
It's a good example of book-smart people, perhaps trying to to good things, but doing so in a vacuum, totally oblivious to the repercussions of their actions.
2006-09-26 05:09:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by kent_shakespear 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
good. they provide money to poor and developing countries for the infrastructure development which is good sign of prosperity around the world
2006-09-26 04:59:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by ZxssxZ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
bad they promise to spend a billion dollar cleaning up the rio grand river if NAFTA was pass and they did not
2006-09-26 04:55:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hello..;)
Can't exactly define them people..!!
they are of course helping the underdeveloped and developing countries..!! but in turn they get profits.
but frankly speaking i guess its not, they are not social organisation...
Its obvious that they get interests....
NO ORGANISATION WILL DO WORK FOR FREE UNLESS ITS AN NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATION...!! [ NGO ]
cheers,,!!
2006-09-26 05:05:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by nikhil r 1
·
0⤊
0⤋