"I will have no part in the creation of a constitutional double-standard to benefit the President. He is not above the law. If an ordinary citizen committed these crimes, he would go to jail." - Bill Frist
"What is on trial here is the truth and the rule of law" - James Sensenbrenner
"This nation sits at a crossroads. One direction points to the higher road of the rule of law. Sometimes hard, sometimes unpleasant, this path relies on truth, justice and the rigorous application of the principle that no man is above the law. Now, the other road is the path of least resistance. This is where we start making exceptions to our laws based on poll numbers and spin control. This is when we pitch the law completely overboard when the mood fits us, when we ignore the facts in order to cover up the truth. No man is above the law, and no man is below the law. That's the principle that we all hold very dear in this country." - Tom Delay
2006-09-26 04:46:06 · 8 answers · asked by notme 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
A bit of "flip flopping" no?
2006-09-26 04:48:01 · update #1
ROFL!!!!!!!!! BINGO!!! great one there!! youre killin' me here!
Tom Delay- with his Marianas Island sweat shop girls in forced abortion labor camps!
too many similar example to site- great question!
2006-09-26 04:53:06 · answer #1 · answered by omnimog 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No-one is above the law. Not even the president. However, I'm tired of all the quibbling between both parties. They were elected to run this country and all they seem to be able to do is point fingers at each other and accuse each other of being wrong. How about some of them doing something right for a change.
I think the American people need to clean house to set an example for the new comers to think about.
2006-09-26 04:57:27 · answer #2 · answered by Cal 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
unquestionably no. What separates a baby-kisser from a classic individual is too much gall. No known individual might have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for springing up deficits. The president can in easy terms propose a funds. He won't be able to stress the Congress to settle for it. The shape, that's the very superb regulation of the land, provides sole accountability to the residing house of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes.. who's the speaker of the residing house? Nancy Pelosi. She is the chief of the final public occasion. She and fellow residing house participants, no longer the president, can approve any funds they want. If the president vetoes it, they might bypass it over his veto in the event that they adjust to. And If the funds is interior the pink, that is with the aid of fact they want it interior the pink. lmao @ 3 thumbs down do human beings no longer be attentive to the way the government works?
2016-10-18 00:22:11 · answer #3 · answered by hosford 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well th thing about the Left is that it wouldnt trust the Right even if the Right said that a circle is a round object. now you can take everything as a lie, because of some things that you cant accept in life, some things that you dislike, or you can think rationally. Note: thinking rationally is harder, Leftists shuld proceed with caution!
2006-09-26 04:51:36 · answer #4 · answered by kunta kinte 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i would state the flip flop...
but i agree with them and if the flip flopping you refer to is the fact that they talk about rule of law and legalities and ALL are in legal battles right now...
that can be applied to dems also
2006-09-26 04:54:16 · answer #5 · answered by DEP 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes I do.Those statements still hold.Where is the flip flop.
2006-09-26 04:52:00 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It could be yes, it could be no, or the opposite.
2006-09-26 05:36:08 · answer #7 · answered by Mysterio 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ya, till it applied to bush and his minions.
2006-09-26 04:51:13 · answer #8 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋