duh. bush and his oil rich friends here thought they could get away with taking over iraq and taking their oil. oops. got caught in another one eh gw?
2006-09-26 04:07:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by jose 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
Al Quaida is merely a front for what's REALLY going on with Iraq!...
http://www.strayreality.com/Lanis_Strayreality/iraq.htm
2006-09-26 11:45:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
because Al Qaida had camps in Iraq long before the invasion , headed by Zarwkowi. Sadam funded the attack on the USS Cole by Al Qaida.
2006-09-26 11:07:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
because of bad/no information from the CIA & FBI - those departments are a waste taxpayers money if they cannot get accurate information together in 10 years.... for Clinton or Bush!!
2006-09-26 11:07:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Why didn't Bill Clinton do it in EIGHT YEARS? He now claims that George Bush should have stopped the 9/11 sneak attack in eight months.
2006-09-26 11:10:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by senior citizen 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
You know the answer to that.
Pull the wool over your own eyes. Let JR "Bob" Dobbs into your mind and uncover the conspiracy.
2006-09-26 11:04:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Simple ... no profit to be made. If it's not lining his pockets or the pockets of his cronies, he's simply not interested. Same reason he did nothing to stop the attack on 09/11?
2006-09-26 11:07:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Because bin-Laden was in Crawford, Texas.
2006-09-26 11:20:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Edward K 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
why did they let bin-laden PASS GO COLLECT 200 DOLLARS in tora bora or do they need him for the mid-term elections?
2006-09-26 11:08:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
This is old, and you know as well that at least he tried and failed. Unlike Clint"off"
2006-09-26 11:11:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by battle-ax 6
·
0⤊
1⤋