2006-09-26 03:59:59 · 29 answers · asked by BeautyMark 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I would vote for Hillary because we gave a whole lot of men a chance to do something great and all have fallen short. Maybe a woman can get the job done. Everything is trial and error, men have failed miserably. We should give a woman the same chance. The only reason I wouldn't vote for Hillary is if a more qualified woman ran against her.
2006-09-26 05:18:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
NO WAY!! She's not qualified. She's a known criminal. She talks out of both sides of her mouth depending on what's popular. She's the wife of a governor of Arkansas, he gets elected president, his term is over and she suddenly owns a house in New York so that she can be a Senator. Why?? Because she knew the people of Arkansas would never support her.
I'll vote for a woman when the right candidate runs, but not that woman.
2006-09-26 11:23:36 · answer #2 · answered by HEartstrinGs 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
NO, Hell NO..... the reasons are obvious, she is a far left wing nut job and she has no moral compass to guide her... she still hangs on to ole lying billy boy and that shows very BAD judgment.... she is a flake...
When she acts normal, which isn't often, she isn't too bad... but I wouldn't want her in charge of a pop stand, let alone any position in government..... she just doesn't belong there.... she is a hard line socialist underneath her facade... a lot of politicians are not worthy of the positions they hold.... such as Kennedy, Spectre, McCain, Feingold, etc.... there are a lot of them.... anti-Americans.....
If it isn't good for the USA, it isn't good for the world.... Socialists aren't good for anything... except misery.....
"The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of the blessings. The inherent blessing of socialism is the equal sharing of misery." Winston Churchill....
2006-09-26 11:25:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I would not vote for Hilary Clinton because I do not support her views. Her only elected office has been senator and in that office she has proven to be an obstructionist and not a leader.
2006-09-26 11:11:32 · answer #4 · answered by damdawg 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
NO! Whitewater, Rose Law Firm, the "Right Wing Conspiracy", her hatred of the military, her disrespect for this country and her liberal leftist views.
And my #1 reason for NOT voting for the Hilldabeast is the CLINTON ADMINISTRATION WAS THE MOST CORRUPT OF ANY IN THE HISTORY OF THE USA.
2006-09-26 11:11:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
No. If you think the Bush years were divisive imagine a Hillary administration. Plus, I remember her health care plan. I want to vote for a leader, not someone who governs by polls.
2006-09-26 11:04:49 · answer #6 · answered by JB 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
No way in Hell! (a nod to Jerry Falwell...)
I wouldn't vote for he because I don't believe she could handle it. What kind of foreign policy would she have? Would she try to negotiate with terrorists?
I also don't believe her healthcare initative would work and finally I couldn't stand her shrill whining for 4 years.
2006-09-26 11:14:51 · answer #7 · answered by MARIA K 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
She loses my vote because a.) she agrees with most democratic stances and b.) she is pro-censorship.
Sorry but censorship is borderline ridiculous.
The Libertarian Party gets my votes.
2006-09-26 11:03:46 · answer #8 · answered by d.anconia 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, we do not need more scandals in the white house. Bill did enough with Monica. Plus all the Whitewater crap that cost us, the taxpayers enough. They were caught in that lie also.
2006-09-26 11:19:38 · answer #9 · answered by always 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I had every intention to campaign for her until she came out for amnesty for the illegals! Now I could not in good conscience vote for her...
2006-09-26 11:09:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋