Why do some people believe politicians over scientists?

Question

On issues like global warming and evolutionary biology >99% of the professionals who have spent their entire lives studying, debating among themselves, working long hours, competing for funding, publishing research papers are dismissed by some of the general public and the politicians who know very little about the topic are believed.

I find this to be beyond all understanding.

Could someone give me a good reason why? And save the BS about scientists being liberals. Scientists are professionals first.

Answer 1

Maybe because people know and "trust" politicians. Maybe because some people really don't care.

This bothers me a lot too, bring a scientist. But I can only do my job and hope that it is enough. Sadly it is hardly very the case.

Politicians oppose what scientists say because we scientists don't pay them millions of dollars to believe us, like oil, cigarret, and automobile companies do.

If you want to learn more about the research/discoveries that are being ignored look into the pharmacutical industry.

Answer 2

Well, first of all, scientists, like all people, tend to consider their pocketbooks. A scientist that theorizes global warming scare scenarios gets more funding than one who says there is no global warming issue. Scientists are not some ideal humans - they are driven by self-interest, too.

Second, you have a lot of politicians who push this global warming agenda, too, like AlGorp. Clearly, anybody can tell that Gore does not really understand the scientific basis for the debate, but because he's one of those enviro-nuts, he has plunged ahead supporting the direst of theories, and pushing a eco-nutjob agenda.

Needless to say, there are a significan number of scientists who do not agree with the Chicken Little "The sky is falling!" global warming theories. They have reviewed the data and find that many of the predictive models use false assumptions to come to dire circumstances.

There are significant numbers of scientists who also debate that increase average temperatures might even be beneficial to mankind.

There are significant numbers of scientists who debate whether there is any human impact or cause in the current small temperature increase. And whether we could do anything about it at this time, anyway.

Scientists have looked at stuff like Kyoto, and determined that the net effect of Kyoto, besides ruined economies, depressions and disrupting lives, is that it would reduce greenhouse gasses by a whopping ½ percent after 50 years, and is therefore not worth the cost.

So, the truth is that there IS debate across the spectrum about global warming. And don't forget that 30 years ago, the same people were predicting a new Ice Age. Skepticism is warranted.

Answer 3

i think the scientist, that say there has been no worldwide warming considering 1995 Like Dr Phil Jones , head of the climatic study midsection at East Anglin college Who keeps the instrumental temperature checklist for the UN IPCC Who final twelve months pronounced that there has been no statistical worldwide warming sine 1995. it is the scientist who keeps the darn worldwide temperature checklist for the UN IPCC !!!!!!!!! 2. plus, who cares ? its unlike something can or would be executed approximately it. you probably did be conscious whilst the democratic party controlled the dwelling house, Senate and White dwelling house and had a filibuster evidence majority that could bypass any regulation they had to. They tried to bypass no climate legislations in any respect. 3, face it, the UN IPCC pronounced that basically nuclear means had the means to change fossil gas means plant life, yet those screaming approximately climate substitute the main, are those unfavourable to nuclear means the main.

Answer 4

No, I don't think it has anything to do with liberalism or conservatism. Speaking for myself, I get really suspicious when a scientist or anyone else tries to cram a theory down my throat and tell me that's the way it is and I'd better not question it or we'll all die.

That's the same tactic employed by car salesmen, so when you see it used, you should be wondering what they don't want you to know.

Answer 5

Scientist like the ones that said Pluto was a planet? Vioxx was safe? Earth is flat? Y2K would be a disaster? Or just the ones looking for funding? LOL

Answer 6

Hands up if you believe in aliens, ghosts etc etc. Yep thought so. People wana believe such guff it's unbelievable.,

As for scientisits being liberals.. I tend to think that scientists SHOULD be liberals.. and aetheists,. The idea that someone can spend all day splitting atoms and then go home at night and actually believe in some devine being is way too crazy for me to believe.

Answer 7

Politicians play upon people's emotions, while scientists deal with their intellects. Very few people are ruled by reason, but most of them are ruled by vulgar emotions and feelings and thus are incapable of comprehending logic.

Answer 8

Because, people only believe what they see on a big screen.

Besides there is a large audience of sheep. Almost 50% of the population didn't vote for bush, and believe anything that comes from the mouths of there Iconic leaders, Moore, Gore, and any star on their side.........BAH...BAH....BAH!!!

Answer 9

Politics is like a religion and THAT is all they know or want to believe in.

Answer 10

It's like the middle age, where everything was heresy.