totally Bush is more neglectful. Bush waiting for 8 months before going to Afghanistan, then did a u-turn to Iraq without even coming close to the target. Secondly, he sat and read to those children for 8 minutes before he was wisked off to safety to camp David. Third, he has yet to do anything to set a plan in action to get Bin Laden out of there. Clinton had to clean up after daddy Bush, but he surely didn't take his good ol'e time doing it. So what if Clinton had a skank give him pleasure, what man would find that offensive. Bush didn't do anything for 3 days after hurricane Katrina, and still isn't doing anything to help those people. Bush is a war president, just like his father and every Republican president we have had. Go to Washington, DC and sit in at capitol hill and listen to those stupid politicians. None of them have a clue. You will never get a "perfect" president as long as those idiots are running congress.
2006-09-26 04:56:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by cookie 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Clinton
2006-09-26 14:44:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Neglectful? Possibly Clinton. Downright dangerously wrong policies?? Bush!
2006-09-26 10:54:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is this a legit Question?
Clinton by a mile.....I mean look at him, be honest. Monika...his own wife ....how could anyone keep there mind on the matters of state when there personal life is or was a shambles and then facing the real possibility of impeachment! Cmon everyone be real!
2006-09-26 10:46:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by battle-ax 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Clinton of course. He was too busy trying to make friends with al qaida to do anything to stop them.
2006-09-26 10:57:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by ignernt 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush, no one died when Clinton lied!
2006-09-26 10:51:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by riffers21 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
How is this hard for you to understand, has Bush been distracted for years on a impeachment case? For having his dick ed sucked by his sectary? He could have got osma but he was to distracted
2006-09-26 10:48:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Neglectful for what?
Well, I guess Bush would have to be the answer.
2006-09-26 11:40:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Big Bear 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Clinton because monica got a stain on her dress, I mean come on how neglectfull can you be.....
2006-09-26 10:48:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by lost&confused 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
bush
2006-09-26 10:46:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by shannon 4
·
0⤊
0⤋