he bombs an innocent country, lets new orleans get destroyed, plots 9/11 so he can get oil from iraq and now he can't find these Weapon of Mass Destruction. so why do you republicans think he did a good job??
infowars.com
2006-09-26 03:27:29 · 32 answers · asked by jay d 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
NO!
We're Brits by the way.
OUR opinion has been the same from the start.
The Irony of America exporting Democracy when they haven't got it 4 themselves, huh?
We watched the US election & cringed.
We said GW would take the World 2 hell in a hand-cart & so far he's doing that pretty well.
More's the pity 4 the World.
2006-09-26 03:50:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes because he went in and at least took action. He didn't bomb an innocent country...talk to a Soldier who's been there. Nothing about that place is innocent.
He doesn't control the weather so how did he "let" New Orleans get destroyed?
As for 9-11, who knows the truth behind that? Even a Democrate would do such a thing so that's basically irrelevant because there is no proof.
Can't find the weapons? Or already has them in his own custody and is plotting how to use them?
I'm not saying he's super awesome, but no President is gonna really do everything right. I believe in Patriotism and standing up for the man in Office because we all put him there so at least let him get his work done!
2006-09-26 03:32:16 · answer #2 · answered by Dr. Kat 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Iraq is NOT an innocent country, God destroyed New Orleans - Bush had no way of saving it, 9/11 was NOT plotted and there were NUMEROUS Weapons of Mass Destruction discovered. He did a great job, you liberal idiot!
2006-09-26 03:30:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Jay D, you forgot to mention that Bush did an excellent job in screwing up the whole world also. Ok, I can accept the fact that we are fighting Taliban because they hosted Bin Laden and many more terrorists and allowed Afghanistan to promote terrorism and Taliban regime refused to cooperate with us unlike Pakistan. Now, why did Bush and Rumsfeld turn around and invaded Iraq and allowed it to be a haven for promoting terrorism and training camps for deadly terrorists, just like it was in Afghanistan? So, how Taliban's behavior is different from Bush's policy in Iraq? We call Talibans as terrorists. So, may I call Bush a terrorists as well? Why are we placing so much power, energy, resources, money and innocent lives (including our brave troops) to promote terrorism in Iraq and consequently in the whole world? Why are we trying to destabilize the whole Middle East and consequently the whole planet of Earth? Why is Bush trying to promote Democracy among fanatic Muslims who don't appreciate Freedom and not ready for any democracy? Why are we allowing other dictators to massacre innocent people (as in Darfur and Somalia)? why are we allowing N. Korea to get its way? Why did we allow Taliban Regime to get stronger and to take over Southern Afghanistan? Why did we allow Iraqis situation to get worst? Well, Is not it logical to focus on Afghanistan first in terms of Forgin Policy and claim "Mission Accomplished"? Is not it logical to focus on the USA first in terms of Internal Policy (as in New Orleans) and claim "Good Job Done"? Please my dear republicans answer my questions honestly.
2006-09-26 04:08:22 · answer #4 · answered by Mr. J 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rarely in the course of a day does one find a question so outrageously politically biased. But today, early this morning some idiot contrives a diatribe of blabber and meaningless drivel that it renders anything he writes as totally irrelevant.
Bush is not a perfect president by any means, but in his first term, he was about as good as we could have expected. His second term has been marked by indecision and total absence of leadership.
2006-09-26 03:46:46 · answer #5 · answered by snvffy 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
"An aide to the prime minister of Canada called President Bush a moron. Well that's not fair. Here's a guy who never worked a day in his life, got rich off his Dad's money, lost the popular vote and ended up president. That's not a moron, that's genius!"
2006-09-26 03:29:27 · answer #6 · answered by Enigma 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
When did Sadam's Regime become Innocent? When did the U.S. government get the ability to create hurricanes? Why would you plot 9/11 to get oil when all we have to do is go get it. You might want to do a little research before you jump to conclusions.
2006-09-26 03:33:59 · answer #7 · answered by btg2281 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
actually they did find wmd's but of course the dem's said those weren't the ones and don't forget that saddam was warned in advance by our buddies in russia and had two weeks to move them across the syrian border..there is intel showing semi's crossing just a week and a half before we hit. and don't forget bush did not attack iraq on his own he had the approval of congress...dem's and rep's alike until of course this war, like so many others is now unpopular so they backpedal on their support
as for destroying n.o. what are you stupid or something, did bush conjure up the hurricane? what about nagin and the governor...they held up the red cross outside of n.o. and wouldn't let them got in for almost a week. i was there, i was one of the volunteers waiting around for them to make the decision.
iraq...an innocent country...now thats laughable...you must get your info straight from the mouth of howard dean...if iraq is innocent then you are bozo the clown....
as for what bush has done right....well lets start with the millions that he is pouring into the fuel industry funding for a green fuel and the millions in funding and support for the ecology. what about all the other laws and bills he has passed which help the elderly, children and families...tax breaks, funding and research for aids, cancer and heart. what about the millions of dollars ear-marked for disaster victims, katrina particulary that is now no where to be found as the local and state government of lousiana seems to have 'lost' a lot of it. ask why the trailers sent down there to house those left homeless are rotting on their wheels in arkansas...the local and state government wouldn't move them in either.
what about our lower gas prices...i'll just bet you blamed him when they were high didn't you...what about praise for bringing them down.
let me ask YOU this what have the dem's done right? what solutions to anything have they offered up?
ppl like you that are so ill informed and find one website that supports your bias and quote that. you have little regard for truth or facts so you pick a sentence or quote and us it over and over. the other problem is you think one person or one group is responsible for all the ills in the world when in reality it takes a country to screw up or succeded that includes you and me so. you give one man, a fallible human being too much power and credit for something he nor you can control. there is so much going on everyday that bush and the whole of government deals with that as private citizens we will never know about and so much except for the 'juicy parts' never make it to the mainstream media....ask yourself this why is there never anything positive said about bush? if this were clinton you'd ask the same thing, there cannot be all bad without some good. there is good and bad ppl in every party and in every walk of life. grow up, do more research that just the sites you want to prove you right..look at the real truth not just that that you want to see...seek the truth regardless of who it hurts or helps...you do that then you are truly open minded and informed...keep like you are...you will stay narrow minded and biased.
2006-09-26 03:44:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I will let you know if it ever happens. The closest thing that I can think of is when he appointed Clinton to the Tsunami and Katrina Relief Efforts.
2006-09-26 03:29:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Clear twisting of the facts.
He managed to get many voters to vote for him. That is a success.
2006-09-26 03:29:21 · answer #10 · answered by unchainmenow 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋