3. Would you change strategy, plan, personnel and policy as events on the ground demand
2006-09-26 03:20:20 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
everything with the US could be solved by revamping our banking and monetary system, pulling the rug out from under corrupt big buisness and political figures , and going to alternate energy technologies .... the flip side of that coin is that leaving the current system of power the way it is it is a REQUIREMENT to go into the middle east for both oil and economic reasons simply for the survival of the US and for it to remain in a dominant position in the world .... so what would i do? ...im not even sure what is possible to do at this point in our history ... kennedy wanted to change things for the betterment of the common man and the country and they killed him for it ...
2006-09-26 03:26:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes I would invade Iraq, for 12 years Bill Clinton, George HW Bush and George W Bush gave them time to conform to the agreements in the original cease fire. It WAS a cease fire, we agreed to stop destroying them if they did certain things, they refused. Saddam Hussein did support terrorists, at the very least he gave money to the families of suicide bombers. He did not cooperate with weapons inspectors, he stalled for so long he gave most reasonable people to suspect that he was hiding weapons. Most importantly it is the war on terror not the war of 911, his level of involvement is not the issue.
Running away is not an option. If we leave now we will embolden terrorists and every country who wishes America harm, it is just not an option. They have always said that we are a paper tiger who will run as soon as it gets tough or lasts too long, we must show our resolve and not prove them right.
The problem with military operations is that the enemy does not cooperate with you. It is easy to make strategy after the fact, Monday Morning Quarterbacks. If I had to change I would have bombed harder at the first invasion and I would have used more bombing in Sunni held areas. It might not be politically correct but I believe US soldiers are more important than than world opinion.
2006-09-26 10:33:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely. However once Sadam was out of the way I would consentrate my efforts back on Afganistan. After all isn't that where Bin Laden is supposed to be hiding. The United States is a more likely hiding place though.
2. Yes for awhile to help the people to rebuild then get the heck out of there.
2006-09-26 10:35:42 · answer #3 · answered by bro_ken128 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1. Simply unequivocally NO.
2. Well I believe we need to come out as soon as possible. However the Bush Administration has screwed things up so bad, it may take a year or more to get out.
3. Of course, any good military strategist changes plans, personnel, etc as the situations demand.
2006-09-26 10:23:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
when they hit the towers that was war . should we of not went and kicked *** {which i think we are doing very well } yes we should of . i remember a concert they had right after for the firemen and all the family's , and there was a guy that got up there and was yelling out BRING IT ON ! and gave out his phone number and address . that is the anger of how every one in this world felt , even the president , but he acted on it . to save America . to not just go over there and bomb every one in sight and we could of . but to get rid of the bad guys and help the good . i think we are doing good , and you cant just start a war then say o to many people are dying . or it cost to much . that's what happened the first time we pulled out and they got smarter . our troops joined the military to defend there country . before it was about free college for some . but now it is to fight . bless our troops . my sister is a master Sergeant in the air force . she would die for anyone in this country and she is my hero
2006-09-26 10:44:32 · answer #5 · answered by no_seeds_aloud 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1. Yes, proof by saddams generals that there was WMD in Iraq and smuggled out just 2 months prior to the war starting.....
2. Yes, Saddam is getting the royalty he deserves and my friends in Iraq are enjoying the cleaner water and fresh food and are gaining coalition support against the extremist mercanaries there to kill the Iraqi people.
3. I would have enlisted the advice of the israelis who have been fighting guerrila warfare for, like, ever.......
2006-09-26 10:25:34 · answer #6 · answered by lost&confused 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I would
1. Feed all the poor people in the country. And Mexico.
2. Build a new home for every single person in the country with the money I'd otherwise have spent in the invasion
3. Pay for college tuition for all the kids in the country
2006-09-26 10:28:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
wel i dont believe in invading a country both israel and iraq should be forced to give up the arms and ammunitions and the supply of weapons should be stopped
2006-09-26 10:37:50 · answer #8 · answered by lakshgupta 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1 yes
2 yes
3 yes, just as Bush does
2006-09-26 10:29:06 · answer #9 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's not about a "war on terror". It's REALLY about THIS!...
http://www.strayreality.com/Lanis_Strayreality/iraq.htm
2006-09-26 11:06:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋