When the Sudanese government offered Bin Laden to Bill Clinton, he is quoted as saying , "I didn't take him at the time because I didn't have any bases for taking him." He is also quoted as saying, "I pleaded with the Saudis to take him." Sunday evening in an interview on Fox news, he blew up when he was asked "Couldn't he have done more on terror?" He said he tried hard to get Bin Laden and he failed. How hard did he try, when he offered Bin Laden? How hard did he try when he pleaded with the Saudis to take him? This guy keeps putting his foot in his mouth everytime he talks. His legacy is more important to him than the safety of the american people. Why is the far Left so supporting of him?
2006-09-26 02:51:30 · 15 answers · asked by Conservative 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Clinton became enraged because Wallace was right and he knew it. Clinton was put on spot and his anger got the best of him. What we saw was the REAL Clinton! Yes we know he a liar that was proved long ago. If I caught you at doing something or not something you should have and had you on spot how would you react? Simple you would get angry and lie your way out of it or accept you blew it? We know which he chose. So he tried to kill Bin Laden yea right if he did he would be dead and over 3000 people who died on 911 would be alive today! He was handed Bin Laden if he wanted him dead it would have been easy! Now Clinton reacted out of being caught nothing more! Why is left supporting him because hes one of them. If Clinton had spent more time on America and less on his privates we might have avoided 911!
Hey Rob the reason Bin Laden is nota big issue as he once was is because we have successfully rendered him far less dangerous!
gurrdy Where is bin Laden dead according to some an dif not he is so weakened (politically) he is not the threat he once was which proves what Bush has done worked!
2006-09-26 03:00:50 · answer #1 · answered by ? 5 · 4⤊ 3⤋
I think really he is a narcissist and that the blow up on TV was planned to some extent. Clitoon has never done anything by accident, well maybe except for the blue dress.
What is funnier is Hillary defending him today and she told a whopper, that Bill would have done something if presented with evidence of a hijacking of planes, which of course he was given that exact scenario years before it happened, and he did exactly NOTHING with it.
2006-09-26 11:35:35 · answer #2 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You are so misinformed, it's like you're a part of the Bush administration or something. Quit bitching about Clinton and look at Bush's record on bin Laden. Didn't Bush say AFTER 9-11, " He really isn't a priority"? Stop blaming Bush's shortcomings on Clinton.
2006-09-26 03:07:01 · answer #3 · answered by rob 3 · 3⤊ 5⤋
The libs always call Bush a liar but they can never come up with one lie that he told, Clinton is a great liar and he got impeached for lying under oath. Funny how the commie libs seem to forget that!
2006-09-26 03:02:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
It's obvious this guy is a liar. He was almost impeached because of it and was disbarred. I don't know why people still listen to this freak. Maybe for a good laugh....
2006-09-26 03:36:10 · answer #5 · answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
That's not really fair. A compulsive liar can't help himself. Clinton knows exactly what he's doing.
2006-09-26 02:55:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Bush has had five years to nab Osama, where is he? Why are our borders as unprotected now as they were pre 9/11? Why did the 9/11 commission, who Bush hand picked, give his adminstration a D grade on national security? Why are our nuclear power plants STILL unprotected?You republicans control everything, and were suppose to believe your leaders when they say there tougher on security? You want so badly to blame Bush's failures on Clinton that you just can't stand it. Get over yourself cry baby.
2006-09-26 03:06:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
You're just mad because Clinton can speak the English language correctly and with ease and Bush can't.
If you are surprised that a politician would lie, then you're about as bright and intellegent as GW!!!!!
2006-09-26 03:12:13 · answer #8 · answered by pouchless 2 · 3⤊ 5⤋
He said "I didn't take him at the time because I didn't have any bases for taking him." You can't even spell "basis" when you are making up quotes so how the hell can we take your post seriously?
2006-09-26 02:56:10 · answer #9 · answered by Akkakk the befuddled 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋
OK. Just for the sake of the argument let's say everything you wrote is true (of course it's not), but let pretend.
Bush has had SIX YEARS (so far). Where is Osama???
2006-09-26 03:39:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋