2006-09-26 02:40:30 · 8 answers · asked by Jacs 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Yes. he still holds that title.
It just goes to show that you can lie about your education, your qualifications, your family background, commit perjury etc., and get sent to jail, but the Establishment still looks after you.
It is one of the shameful things about the UK honours system. He should have been stripped of his title the moment he was sent to jail.
2006-09-26 02:55:30 · answer #1 · answered by avian 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately, Yes
2006-09-26 09:49:42 · answer #2 · answered by Peter T 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i guess so. This article still calling him Lord Archer
2006-09-26 09:51:42 · answer #3 · answered by yattychan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes he is. It's disgraceful that he has not been stripped of the title but, as they say, they look after their own.
2006-09-26 18:02:01 · answer #4 · answered by bob kerr 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think he was stripped of the title
2006-09-26 09:42:33 · answer #5 · answered by Taylor29 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
More to the point, why isn't he hiding in Argentina in shame?
2006-09-26 09:49:34 · answer #6 · answered by Masterwho? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is shameful but I think he still is !
2006-09-26 09:48:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
a gaylord!
2006-09-26 09:42:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋