Once again, lies, lies, lies.
It was the "I-did-not-have-sexual-relations..." thing all over again.
And I knew he had trouble keeping his hands off of women, but you would think he could keep them off of Chris Wallace's lap!
There is an old quote that goes something like this...
"Bill Clinton may not be the worst president we have ever had, but he is the worst person we have ever had as president." I totally agree.
2006-09-26 02:27:21 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
According to Rice, he lied just about every time he moved his lips during that inteview. Here is the link.
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=514&u=/ap/20060926/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/rice_clinton_6
2006-09-26 02:32:48 · update #1
Mr. Ed - Because Clinton was so preoccupied with the problems caused by his infidelity, almost 3000 people died on 9/11.
If Willy had kept his "willy" under wraps, perhaps he could have been a head of state.
What you do in your personal time is your deal, but during your term in office, YOU HAVE NO PERSONAL TIME. That means you have NO TIME TO play hide and seek with the intern.
It does no good to tell you this, though, because you obviously don't care about honesty in matrimony or fidelity to one's country.
2006-09-26 03:29:48 · update #2
Yeah it does seem rather obvious that he is a pathological liar. He lies so well he convinces himself too.
2006-09-26 02:56:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
It is most politicians and other folks who work in the Federal arena. Used to work around those types and it seems to me you never ever say anything that will put blame on yourself. You always always have to watch anything you say because it can and will be used against you by someone else. Really a terrible way to live. Glad to be rid of that place. Some people thrive though in that environment and they really enjoy the scheming and power games but as Clinton and others know it is a two-edged sword. Clinton is by no means the only person or president for that matter to have screwed up royally in office (think Nixon) but that really was lame of him to lie in that way to the American people and to his wife. I'm no Clinton lover but let's move on though.
2006-09-26 09:41:57 · answer #2 · answered by MickYahoo 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Let's face it, all politicians lie. Some overdo it, like "Slick Willie" Clinton. What about his parting shot of pardoning some thief named Rich who gave a million to Clinton's campaign? As a gun owner, I think Clinton is the worst prez I recall. He constantly tried to enact stupid new laws, and when Congress wouldn't go along with all of that nonsense, he joined a crooked lawyer named Gautier who tried to go around Congress and sue the gun industry out of business. Luckily, Bush has not continued these illegal vendettas against law-abiding gun owners, so Clinton's ten year assault weapons law expired in 2004, and the junk lawsuits are being made illegal, as they always were, in fact. Who could trust such a ruthless man as this? If he tells the truth, it is by accident.
2006-09-26 10:28:07 · answer #3 · answered by miyuki & kyojin 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
We are all capable of telling both truth & lies.
Your "question" is just more psuedo-conservative bombast meant to divide people. If you were a true American you would seek to unite, not divide. Where is your solution?
Was Pres. Clinton lying? You have zero evidence & your link to the Condie Rice snippet didn't really offer any evidence either, just the official party line.
Pres. Clinton was very truthful in admitting he failed when it came to bin Laden. But so has Pres. Bush.
In reference to your "old quote" - if you can't supply the source, it really isn't a quote - just something you want to see in print.
2006-09-26 09:56:01 · answer #4 · answered by Bad M 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Bush is far worse than Clinton. Bush lied about his reasons for going into Iraq and thousands died. Not to mention that Bin Laden is still out there plotting....if there is another attack by Al Qaeda it is becuase Bush left them go to finish his daddy's war.
2006-09-26 10:48:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
How many people got killed by Clinton lying compared to Bush lying,it's sad more troops killed in Iraq than 9/11 for what the US and the world are less safe today.
2006-09-26 10:02:29 · answer #6 · answered by Mojo Seeker Of Knowlege 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No. He has been honest about everything except the Monica scandal. Which he appolagized for. Give it a rest. And in case you have not noticed, he is not the president any more. he is a private citizen and the guy who is the president now tells much more dangerous lies.
2006-09-26 09:43:02 · answer #7 · answered by JS 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
As bad as the Slickster may be as a human being, Lyndon Johnson was even worse. It wasn't co-incidental that JFK was shot in Texas.
2006-09-26 09:41:28 · answer #8 · answered by SPLATT 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
what did he lie about and can you prove it?
The lewinsky thing, yeah, but what are you talking about? If it is refernce to the Fox interview, get over it. It is ALL verifiable.
________
Did you see the sources Rice provided? No. There were none. She is playing the politics game "He never did that! That never happened"
You are just picking and choosing who you will take at their word when both groups are known liars. BOTH GROUPS
to BUFFCHICK -
Verifiable - Richard Clarke. Go to a library and read. Clinton was the ONLY Democrat he worked for and knew all of the goings on regarding terrorism. How can he, having worked since Reagan, not go into the Bush administration with any info. You sheeple need to get a clue.
2006-09-26 09:29:11 · answer #9 · answered by DEP 3 · 7⤊ 6⤋
Clinton lies, Bush lies, they all lie.. at least the world didn't hate us so much when Clinton was president..
2006-09-26 09:36:11 · answer #10 · answered by Byakuya 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋