is circumcision is necessary if the foreskin is retractable?

Answer 1

THE FORESKIN MAY NOT BE RETRACTABLE UNTIL PUBERTY OR LATER, IT IS NORMAL. BUT IF THERE IS A TRUE PROBLEM, THEN THERE ARE CORRETIVE PROCEDURES.

MOTHERS, the feelings of mothers who observed the circumcision of their babies. Go here if you have the courage:
http://www.circumcision.org/mothers.htm
They do not remember the pain when they grow up, but I wonder what kind of neurological damage it does to inflict such severe pain to such a young one!

In the US circumcision started to stop boys from masturbating; they will take much longer to reach the orgasm, and the orgasm will not be as intense, but that will not stop them.
Nowadays the “medical” reasons to circumcision are for Doctors to make MONEY!!!

RELIGION--If God intended boys to not have "skin" He would have made them so.
http://www.nocirc.org/religion/

HYGIENE--Use a new invention, soap and water!!! Women produce much more “smegma”, all kinds of discharges, wetness, and smells; because of physiologic and anatomical reasons, and how would you feel if they cut your vulva lips??? Women, why don’t you answer my question, are you afraid? Baby girls are more likely to get urinary tract infections and no one suggests we surgically alter them at birth to reduce the risks! Just one of many double standards and laws that always treat men worse.

MEDICAL REASONS--No medical reasons. A extremely small chance of a complication do not justify the removal of the foreskin, if so, why don't we remove the tonsils and the appendix when a child is born, and the chance of complications of the tonsils and the appendix is much greater. And for infections of all the organs, including female organs, use a new invention called antibiotics. Talking about complications, in fact many baby boys die each year from circumcision and related complications.
EVEN if phimosis occurs, instead of chopping it off like barbarians!, use Conservative Treatments like:
-Topical Medication(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Dilation and Stretching(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Combination treatment(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Preputioplasty is the medical term for plastic surgery of the prepuce or foreskin(many methods).
If you want more detail on Conservative Treatments, go here:
http://www.cirp.org/library/treatment/phimosis/
http://www.circinfo.org/alternatives.html
And now they invented a new reason to make money, the risk of STD in uncircumcised men. Well actually uncircumcised men have more protection, but in practical terms that protection means nothing, because circumcised or not, if you have sex without protection and your partner have an STD you will be infected FOR SURE! That means, it is just one more stupid and desperate reason in order to make money with circumcisions.

SEX--Foreskin actually enhances the sexual experience for men because it constantly moves over the head of the penis causing more friction and pleasure. Men will also lose much sensitivity to the glans if circumcised.
Circunsized men will have to deal with disconfot and dry glans.
The foreskin have those functions: protective, erogenous, sensory, and sexual physiologic. After all, why would you want to lose all of those “Meissner corpuscles”, the same nerve complexes which provide fine touch to the fingertips?
It is there for many reasons, that is how a man should be(it is natural).
If women like it better circumcised because it looks better(strange, not natural) or gives them more sexual pleasure(strange, not natural), then too bad, they do not have the right! All men do not like mutilated vulvas, and all men like breasts with nipples, they do not like mutilated breasts, etc, etc, etc, because that is the way those organs are supposed to be, it is natural. Interesting, isn’t?!!!

If that was a common practice to do that to baby girls, all the women would be in a big uproar about it(and men too!, men are not like women), but it’s ok to mutilate little boys. The great majority of the ones that agree with circumcision are women for their stupid selfish reasons. Even court cases reported in which mother and father fight because the mother wants to mutilate the son, it is always the mother!. You women should be ashamed to that to your son. Men that are not circumcised, will not get circumcised when adults, they would scream, kick, fight and run, if someone tries to mutilate their privates area, just like you women would run too if someone tried to do that to your labia. Men that where circumcised do not realize what they lost because never had one, and most of them that do realize try to justify it so they do not feel bad about it. Many circumcised men feel very bad emotionally because of what was done to them to such a private area.
It is mutilation of defenceless children in the most private spot, genital mutilation.
It is cruel and barbaric.
It is a human rights violation.
It is not the parent’s decision; it is the parents decision if they want to abuse him, rape him, or to kill him?.
I do not even agree that it is ok if an adult man wants to get circumcised. I think it is wrong, because if a man wants to lose a finger, the Doctor can not do that to him. Think about it, think, think. And by the way, adult men that decide to get circumcised, do it because they know most women like it, they just do it to be more accepted by women.
I think it is just like slavery and all other barbaric acts of the past, it was accepted because it was common practice or tradition, everyone accepted slavery without questioning the facts, but it is not accepted anymore in a modern and fair and civilized society. Circumcision must not be allowed, BY LAW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Many other reasons not to do it, check it out:
http://www.mothersagainstcirc.org/
http://www.cirp.org/library/treatment/phimosis/
http://www.noharmm.org/
http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/
http://www.circumcisionquotes.com/boydies.html

Answer 2

Circumcision is usually not necessary even when the foreskin isn't retractable. There are many other alternatives - less painful and invasive alternatives - to circumcision for most of the problems that many would suggest it for. If you're not having like recurrent and painful infections or severe phimosis (where your foreskin opening is so small/tight that erections are painful) then circumcision could probably be avoided.

Answer 3

A non-retractable foreskin in a child does not, in itself, usually require surgery and will normally become retractable as he matures. Medical intervention may be needed only when non-retractability is combined with inflammation, infection, scarring or other serious problems. Circumcision can be necessary if these other symptoms are present but even then there are often other options.



hope that helps if not read this...

Answer 4

It is not necessary, and it is not desirable! The foreskin is there for a reason - it protects the head of the penis. It also contains many thousands of nerve endings, so sex is much less pleasurable for a cut man. More than 80% of the men in the world have not had this barbaric surgery.

There are many myths, such as that the foreskin is dirty (only if you never take showers/baths, in which case all of your body is dirty) or smelly (keep it clean) or carries disease (simply untrue).

Happily the procedure is becoming less common in the United States, which is one of the very few places in the world where it is done for non-religious reasons. Doctors should refuse to remove a healthy body part, and insurance should not pay for it.

Answer 5

it really is promoted in Africa as a fashion of forestall HIV, no longer AIDS. you've an fairly uneducated healthcare professional if he would not understand the distinction between HIV and AIDS. also there is no evidence that circumcision has something to do with the transmission of STDs. i imagine the clinical note you're searching for for is kerantnization. Which does reason an fairly significant quantity of sensitivity loss. i changed into circumcised at beginning and restored my foreskin. once you restore your foreskin your head loses that kerantinized layer and your sensitivity comes again. I more beneficial than doubled my sensitivity from that. so as that exhibits you only how a lot it ought to get rid of. i imagine your urologist is somewhat biased. A frenulum breve (tight frenulum) isn't a effect from phimosis (tight foreskin). A frenulum breve is from the foreskin only being evidently tight from beginning. i'd be stretched out with a steroid cream or you will get it cut back with a frenuloplasty. in spite of the indisputable fact that earlier you try something else i'd only try a steroid cream and some stretching excercises and be conscious what it ought to do for you. i imagine it really is continually extra ideal to purpose a something like that for a pair months first earlier only going perfect to surgical procedure. in case you sense that your frenulum is somewhat the precedence then only tell your urologist you want a frenuloplasty. If he refuses then flow to somebody else. straightforward and that. I believe you. in case you sense the stress on the frenulum then it really is maximum likely that frenulum breve and it could be fastened with the easy cut back. do not enable someone talk you into circumcision if it really isn't any longer what you want to do. -Connor

Answer 6

no when the for skin retracts circumcision is not necessary, unless its something you have been wanting done