0ks this sounds pretty stupid,lol.If females couldnt produce babies,would men treat them like ****,and if women couldnt produce,would thier be a war between males and females,pretty weird,hmmm.Men out there,By the way this is what my boyfriend told me:S
2006-09-24 20:31:52 · 3 answers · asked by BabyGurL 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
oks what i mean is that,men would not bother getting into a relationship with a female if she couldnt produce babies,and men wouldnt really give a f_ _ _k about them,and they would keep to themselfs...it's weird thinking about it..do men really think like that..
2006-09-24 20:46:27 · update #1
the truth,,,,I've been married 15 years ,dated for five.My wife got endomitri-itis(a form like ovarian cancer)the second year of dating,the other ovary 5 years after marriage,so kids are out of the question,the only thing that makes us treat each other like sh@t is when we argue,no war,a lot of emotions when you see a child and every so often it hits you(but thats why theres adoption,so tell him sorry dude..he's ignorant
2006-09-24 22:08:48 · answer #1 · answered by stygianwolfe 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your boyfriend is a freakin idiot. No, because it's the sex we want,,, not the babies. plus that would be the last generation of people. Tell him to cut down on the cronic!
2006-09-24 20:37:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
hummmm maybe he should think of it this way if women didnt have babies he wouldnt be here either
2006-09-24 20:36:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋