Sorry, I haven't seen the match
2006-09-24 19:19:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Bluffmaster 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Happy with the Indian win but disappointed we couldnt make it to the semis. Dhoni's captaincy was out of touch,there were lots of strategical blunders and having Rohit Sharma did no good..Having said that Duplessis played a fabulous t20 innings which included shots that would've received appreciation even if it was a ODI.It is really difficult to not allow SA to restrict under 121 with their batting going till the tailenders.
2016-03-27 08:04:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
YEAH in my view cricket grounds all over the world shud have a same size, just as any other game. At the moment some grounds have a very short boundary and some have a very long one such as MCG.
2006-09-24 19:22:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by lawrance00021 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes. I agree with you. All the grounds should be of the minimum stipulated size
2006-09-25 04:30:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by vakayil k 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes i agree to there should be a standard size specified for a ground so that it will be fare for all. else we would see more of these things where small grounds will have high scoring games, also it will make the batsman just to stand and swing there bat and not play quality cricket.
2006-09-24 19:51:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by anuk F 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes,good suggestion
2006-09-27 21:22:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
But did they win. There should no minimum size to the ground, why people are there to be entertained.
2006-09-24 19:16:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by brogdenuk 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
defenitely there must be a specific size mentioned for the ground!!!
2006-09-25 01:55:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by aki 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes
2006-09-25 18:14:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Leo H 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
no
2006-09-27 04:39:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋