Omg! It was horrible. Nicholas Cage must have been desperate for a movie. That was horrible I wanted my money back.
Is it me or do movies get worse and worse every year?
2006-09-24 18:40:46 · 6 answers · asked by SarinaAnn 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
It was a very bad remake of a fairly good movie... I agree, I felt that I had been robbed...
2006-09-24 18:42:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
THIS is why I get so tired of and disgusted by REMAKES. The ORIGINAL movie "Wickerman" is a time-tested CLASSIC and there was no conceivable reason for them to make a new version. In 99 out of 100 cases the original is better than the remake; the ONLY time it ISN'T is when the original was made either too cheaply or with really bad actors!
2006-09-25 01:45:32 · answer #2 · answered by backinbowl 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, it was bad. I thought Nicholas Cage looked awful, way to skinny! The acting was bad, the ending was rushed and the middle was slow. They really messed up a great original movie. If you get a chance, definitely rent the original. You'll really enjoy it.
2006-09-25 01:49:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
For sure man It was like you wanted to walk out but u didnt want to leave cause you thought it might get better...Yeah right the ending was the gayest part in the whole movie...I was pissed off too and I almost did ask for my money back...I think Nicolas Cage wasnt good in world trade center either...Just a bad acting year I guess.
2006-09-25 01:49:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You know what I don't get?
In the original you get a neat twist at the end. It's kinda what makes the movie.
In a remake there is no twist because we know the ending from the original.
Could someone please call Hollywood and give them a heads-up?
2006-09-25 02:17:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
hate it too
2006-09-25 01:42:57 · answer #6 · answered by TANNY P 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋