two or three?

Question

We have-
1. self.
2. things distinguishable from self (non self).
3. things indistinguishable from self.

Is 3 and 1 same or different?

Answer 1

Or do we "have?"

If the Universe is a indivisible Whole, any single boundary will divide the whole into a duality, not a trinity.

If an ego boundary exists, the Universe is divided into "self" and "non-self" by this boundary. That which is indistinguishable from self is a matter of perception.

Answer 2

Yes 1 & 3 r same. Bcoz "thing indistinguishable from self" = "self"
Why r u crazy 2 find answer of this trifle question ? But the question is really interesting.

Answer 3

I think so ...I think if 3 is indistinguishable from self it must be part of the defining make up of self.

Answer 4

According to Sartrean existentialism, Identities are constructed by the individual consciousness only: As an extension of the first tenet, the individual consciousness constructs a "self" or "identity" for itself. An "identity" can include beliefs, projects, and various other things of value. Sartre argues that no one else, including God if he existed, can choose your "identity" for you. Kierkegaard's knight of faith and Nietzsche's Übermensch are some such examples of those who create their own "identity".

Answer 5

if self is the only perceiver, then, yes, I'd say 1 and 3 are the same.

Answer 6

i think 3 &1 are same simply saying

Answer 7

I see three.
That which is true.
That which is not true.
That which appears to be true.

Don't judge a book by it's cover.

Answer 8

No, all three are different.

Answer 9

They are same .