Bush and Cheney said "we never found any WMD's". Why are idiots still trying to use that one for Iraq?

Question

NEWSFLASH!! Bush and Cheney have said we haven't found any WMD's. In fact Bush to this day still makes jokes about how we haven't.

Military experts have all said " the serin and mustard gas was in effective. They both only have a shelf life of one month and are useless.

They then announced they were ww1 vintage crap. My Moms burrito's are more dangerous then that crap. To Iraq supporters, Nice try but nobody's buying it.

And if people want to use the lame excuse "saddam was naughty and not nice so we went in" guess what? WHO THE HELL CARES!!

Nobody cares what he did to his people. Besides he got his stuff from Reagan and Bush (this was after they gave arms to Iran, and before they trained, armed, financed Bin Laden).

That's why we know he never had WMD's, because he ran out and wanted more, so Reagan and Bush said no, and the mass killings stopped.

For those who believe he had WMD's I have ocean front property in the Sahara desert for sale It's a good deal I swear.

This is just in case people still try to make the case for WMD's. This is from official C.I.A conclusions from the Bush administration http://www.smh.com.au/news/breaking-news/white-house-knew-there-were-no-wmd-cia/2006/04/22/1145344306427.html

Answer 1

Neocons are delusional about any facts concerning their lying leaders. Intelligent Americans know the difference and it will all show up at the polls in November. Fox News should go on trial as co-conspirators as well to stop all of this nonsense in the future.

Answer 2

It is puzzling how they keep on rehashing the same old failed programs. It in fact is baffling me.

President Bush has tried hard and he has maintained a refusal to compromise on the Iraq war which has gained him some support from hard line hawks. However, standing back from the war and looking at it objectively, under Bush’s leadership as Commander-in-Chief, virtually no results have been positive. Iraq is still out of America’s control in many key areas. After five years we are still struggling to keep Bagdad secure. $500,000,000.00 has been spent so far, enough to pay off government debt bills and/or provide significant social programs or tax relief. In summary, G W Bush is a failure. The Republican Party should be voted out of office in November.

Answer 3

I'm really getting tired of everyone who keeps saying Bush lied.

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program".- President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear programs. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al-Qaeda members. It is clear, however,Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capability to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D,NY) Oct.10,2002

"We are in possession of what I think is compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Bob Graham (D, Fla) Dec. 8, 2002

Were those lies as well?

I could go on and on but the bottom line is everyone..both parties thought Saddam had WMD's. Intelligence from other nations as well said he had them. Shoot, Saddam himself said he had them.

Bad intell? Maybe...but certainly not lies

Answer 4

It's sad to see how illiterate you are! Saddam used WMD's on the Kurds. It's nice how you say we don't care about what he did to his people. The fact is that Clinton, Bush and the entire world believed Saddam had WMD's because Saddam chose to make everyone believe that. Also, do you really know what was sent to Syria before we invaded. We would be speaking German if no one cared what Hitler did to the Jews. Was that made up too?

Answer 5

Why did Clinton say he had WMDs? When your dealing with a 911 situation and you have a ruler of an America hating country that, in recent years has killed over 1 million of his own people , theres a need to disarm him. You need to listen to what Clintons said about Iraq before you apply this logic only to Bush and company. Get informed.

Answer 6

What nonesense! Are you making this crap up as you go? Yes, sure Saddam Hussein had no WMD, yet mysteriously hundreds of thousands of Iranians, Kurds, and even Iraqis died from various biological weapons made by Saddam the Dictators over the years, particularly in his war with Iran.

There is absolutely no doubt that not only did he possess WMD, but actually used them. No one can dispute that.

Your comments are so hysterically ridiculous that I feel that I am writing to a little kid who has no education with no sense of history or a sense of reality. Go back to your liberal school and continue your nonesense education or lack thereof.

Answer 7

People who don't read newspapers or are scared to death of another attack have been brainwashed by Fox News and various hatemongers. The religious right has threatened their followers with eternal damnation if they don't support the criminals in power right now. Some people simply can't think for themselves and it is easier to do what they're told.

Answer 8

HO-HUM..doesn't really matter to moi as i would never believe anything those two arrogant, self-serving , lying pathetic excuses for human beings might say anyway, guaranteed its a lie or they'll backflip 5min later

Answer 9

How about getting a new drum to beat?

Saddam himself was a WMD. Just ask the Kurds or Iranians. Get a life, quit parroting.

Answer 10

We all get that...Why don't we move on to the next thing like bringing our boys home and then passing legislature on non interference with any country's internal affairs?