A new report by the U.S. intelligence agencies (the link below) says that the Iraq War spawned a new generation of terrorists. When liberals (not Democrats who went along with it) said this would happen they got called, "stupid," "anti-American" and "unserious about security."
So conservatives, where is your apology?
P.S.- There were no WMD's, in case Rush Limbaugh or Fox forgot to mention that most unwanted of facts.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/24/world/middleeast/24terror.html?_r=1&ei=5094&en=22b7a0941b08007f&hp=&ex=1159156800&partner=homepage&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin
2006-09-24 17:18:06 · 14 answers · asked by eskimo 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
They still might find the WMDs.............. probably right around the same time O.J. finds " The REAL KILLERS".
2006-09-24 17:30:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
First of all, the New York Times is NOT a credible source. They are a liberal, biased newspaper that never prints stories with accuracy. Now...we didn't go to Iraq to get WMD. Whoever keeps saying that needs to keep their mouth shut. We went over there because Saddam Hussein was a threat to national security and we took him out. The jihadists and islamofachists, such as Bin Laden and that nutcase from Iran, are the ones spawning a new generation of terrorists. If you go deeper, you will notice that a lot of the terrorists talked about didn't come from Iraq. They trained in surrounding areas such as Pakastan and Saudi Arabia. Bottom line is that conservatives don't need to apologize for anything and liberals need to apologize for everything.
2006-09-24 17:54:56 · answer #2 · answered by SnowMaiden111604 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Allow me to quote you, "There were no WMD's, in case Rush Limbaugh or Fox forgot to mention that most unwanted of facts."
Now, if you are an absolute unrealistic moron you will say that Seren and other chemical weapons are not WMD's... so I am going to make the assumption you never heard the fact that there were some large quatities found. I will assume this because you watch CNN or MSNBC or you just listen to whatever the nutjobs on Air America tell you and read nothing but the liberal baised newpapers such as the NY Times, and you don't follow through and do your own research....
No apology is needed from "conservatives" as you put it.. BTW, why is it you use the term conservatives as if it's derrogatory but you won't refer to Democrats as liberals? Hmm... what an odd way to phrase things....
Someday in the future you will understand what this war has done for Americans but you probably still won't accept it.
2006-09-24 17:33:01 · answer #3 · answered by wizardslizards 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The war in Iraq was a brilliant move by the US. When the president invaded Iraq all the terrorists that escaped Afghanistan regrouped and guess where they turned up? You guessed it! Iraq. Now we have another chance at killing the people who want to see every human being that isn't Arabic or Muslim die.If the president takes flak for it being a mistake, well then all the better. Also we can now invade Iran on 2 fronts instead of one. But to apologize for liberating a country that kills you for the smallest of human freedoms. I think not.
2006-09-24 17:36:30 · answer #4 · answered by RIDLEY 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Just as soon as liberals admit there soft on terrorism .
Lets see 8 years of Clinton brought us
1. Blackhawk down incident
2. Waco (nice job btw )
3. Oklahoma city
4. WTC the 1st time
5. Kohbar towers
6. The 2 embassies in 98
7. Bombing a Chinese embassy in Belgrade (blame it on the CIA)
8. USS Cole
What a record of failure
2006-09-24 17:54:26 · answer #5 · answered by Fatwa Freddie 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, I don't think I'm a conservative, so I can't speak for them.
The idea of conservatism is that you try keep things as they are. But I suppose that - when enough kids of conservative parents have died in Iraq - there is a slight chance that they will think twice and realize that 99 out of 100 heroes are dead heroes.
2006-09-24 17:35:40 · answer #6 · answered by Dick V 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
there were wmd's that saddam had lied about (chemical weapons) and saddam was actively trying to obtain nuclear weapons, if Bush hadn't done what he did and saddam had obtained nuclear weapons and used them then everyone would be asking why Bush never did anything and it would be an outrage just as people are saying things about not getting ubl before 911
2006-09-24 17:34:18 · answer #7 · answered by webb51731 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Never! They are so worried about what others think about them that they couldn't possibly admit the truth. Sadly, I just read that we have lost more American lives in Iraq than were lost in the WTC. Still, Bush is too arrogant to step down.
2006-09-24 17:28:13 · answer #8 · answered by schweetums 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
In my opinion, when the administration says "whether you support the reasons for going to war or not, we are there and leaving will be disaster." or "we made mistakes but we would do it all the same again." they are admitting it was a mistake.
I doubt a more direct admission will be made.
2006-09-24 17:26:11 · answer #9 · answered by imnogeniusbutt 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
And they aren't even going to admit it or apologize now. They are already saying how we are taking it out of context. Watch...they'll be jumping on this question with all kinds of republican "whining"
2006-09-24 17:34:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋