English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Was the United States in a crisis under the Articles of Confederation or was the "crisis" exaggerated by the Federalists to justify their movement? Could the United States have survived if the Articles has stayed in effect?

2006-09-24 17:05:24 · 5 answers · asked by xscarredapplex 1 in Arts & Humanities History

5 answers

Most historians agree that the Articles of Confederation were far too weak to make one nation out of the 13 states, and that there was indeed a crisis in the country -- basic functions like taxation, assembling national armed forces, and many other aspects of national government that we take for granted today were practically impossible under the Articles.

2006-09-24 17:13:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

The Articles of Confederation created a very loose association between the states. The states were very powerful. The central government was very weak, to the point that it couldn't hold the states together--the Constitution gave more power to the federal government, and less to the individual states.

2006-09-25 01:46:14 · answer #2 · answered by cross-stitch kelly 7 · 1 1

They have been below disaster below the articles. The crucial government had no actual authority. the only ingredient protecting the government from going bankrupt grew to become into the land ordinance. Britain nonetheless had a militia presence in united statesterritory. some states had no actual protection from mob rule. the militia grew to become right into a comedian tale. some states even seen ceding from the union.

2016-10-01 08:16:37 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

because it gave the states more power than the federal government.

2006-09-26 04:14:54 · answer #4 · answered by krpsky 2 · 1 0

What he said!

2006-09-24 18:26:33 · answer #5 · answered by Squid Vicious 3 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers