I was wondering if anyone ever sat and figured out the timeline of the movie, wrote it down and figured out the real chronological sequence of the movie and either burned it that way or found a way to track the DVD so that it fits chronologically? I had a friend that told me he saw it done once and the movie was actually kinda boring?
2006-09-24 17:01:22 · 10 answers · asked by james_spader_jr 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
The first scene, chronologically, in the movie has Vincent and Jules chatting in their car while on their way to do a job. The last chronological scene has Butch and Fabienne riding away from the hotel on Butch's newly acquired motorcycle (and the "last line" of the movie is therefore "Zed's dead, baby; Zed's dead." (Chronologically, the first scene would be when Christopher Walken's character (Captain Koons) visits the young Butch and gives him the watch.
The correct chronological order of the film is: Vince and Jules, The Bonnie Situation, The Diner (both parts), Jackrabbit Slims, and The Gold Watch.
It seems it would be VERY boring done in order.
2006-09-24 17:51:57 · answer #1 · answered by ★Fetal☆ ★And ☆ ★Weeping☆ 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
if you enjoyed the movie the way it was in the first place then you probably won't enjoy it any other way. It's usually set up that way because it provides for the best viewing pleasure. If it was going to better in chronological order it would've been made that way
2006-09-25 00:11:06 · answer #2 · answered by twig_88 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If it is boring that way why ask this question?
You would probably runout of presets on yoour DVD player to progan a DVD player to do that not to mention it would mess up the sound sync with the video sync. Not a good idea.
2006-09-25 00:12:03 · answer #3 · answered by LORD Z 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You can't put it in chronological order. The stories would intertwine with each other. Even if it was in chronological order I don't see how it would be boring!!
2006-09-25 00:35:01 · answer #4 · answered by rswdew 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have never heard of that. That wasn't Tarantino's style. Same with Resevoir Dogs. Any chance he was thinking of a movie called Momento?
2006-09-25 00:05:02 · answer #5 · answered by Fleur de Lis 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
why worry about things like that the movie is tops and was made that way. tarantino is iether a genius or raving mad and after his lst few movies im leaning toward raving mad
2006-09-25 00:04:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Any movie re-edited by an amateur would be boring.
2006-09-25 07:39:01 · answer #7 · answered by Caffeinated 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That was and is one of the greatest movies EVER made
2006-09-25 00:03:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
the editing always makes things better
2006-09-25 00:42:40 · answer #9 · answered by Christina 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
IDK...i am not sure what you mean.
2006-09-25 00:05:07 · answer #10 · answered by thewickedrobot 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋