would it really be duely justified? or just an excuse to divert people's attention?
2006-09-24 16:51:56 · 7 answers · asked by The Lioness 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Criminals must die and cannot evade that justice should be done.
2006-09-24 16:54:56 · answer #1 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Governments, same as individuals try to justify their killing as the means to an end. That it had to be done to control worse caos down the road. And that taking out some one was a needed evil to proserve life down the road. If, in truth, there was only a hunch that the person lopped off even had the will or the means to do it. If anything, the government tries to hide the fact so that people will not ask too many question. Like the rethoric, "If we do not kill them over there, they will be killing us over here".
2006-09-27 10:12:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ask Israel - I'll list some of their victims below
Olaf Palme
John F. Kennedy
Yitzhak Rabin
Anna Carlson
Nicolae Ceaucescu
Pope John Paul II (almost)
Anwar Sadat (and they made peace with him 2 years earlier)
Gerald Ford (failed twice)
Mohammed Jibril
Elie Hobeika
Raed al-Karmi
and others....
2006-09-24 23:59:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
none my dear. extrajudicial killings can never be duely justified.
2006-09-27 00:16:39 · answer #4 · answered by Doctor Gorgeous 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dead men tell no tales.
Whatever justification (or the absence of it) the government has, any killing is murder and justifications wont give life to the dead.
2006-09-26 01:50:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
None.
2006-09-24 23:56:39 · answer #6 · answered by Bummerang 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
"You bad-mouthed my mom" (and you tried to kill ma daaady)
2006-09-24 23:53:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋