I'm British and I'm glad to be represented by a head of state who has intelligence and decorum, yet sometimes I receive comments from Americans who make it sound like having the Queen is a bad thing. I am against having a president because I feel that politicians are unfit to represent a country - all too often they have their own agenda and don't always put their countries' interests first.
Being represented by a monarch doesn't make me any less free. It doesn't mean my voice is any less well heard and taken into account. It doesn't mean I have less say over how the country is run.
Do you all seriously think the Queen still sits in her office making all the decisions and the people just have to follow her word? You do realise don't you that we elect a government to run the country, and we are just as free and democratic as you? Yes the queen has to give royal assent to bills, but royal assent hasnt been refused since Queen Anne, the current Queen has no power.
2006-09-24
16:35:00
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Government
I don't know about other monarchies, but the British monarchy costs the British taxpayer less than 70 pence each per year, and brings in far more money though tourism. How muhc does it cost to maintain the white house?
2006-09-24
16:38:15 ·
update #1