English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

anyone saying americans are safer now or even if bin laden is gone, is a bold faced liar

2006-09-24 16:26:11 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

6 answers

Am I lying when I say that there hasn't been another terror attack on US soil since 9/11? You call that bad? Put down the booze - it's beddie-bye time for you!

2006-09-24 16:37:03 · answer #1 · answered by Mr. Boof 6 · 0 0

War on terror is going badly because you can't fight an abstract idea by sending armies into other countries. Frequently terrorists are native citizens.
Bush's wars have produced more US dead than 9/11, so I don't know if Americans are safer now. I don't know if people who say that Americans are safer now are liars, but these are facts they ignore/are ignorant of.

2006-09-24 23:43:49 · answer #2 · answered by Dick V 3 · 0 1

America is not safer

More terrorists are being created, because none of the government or CIA responsible for the terrorism of 9/11 have yet been brought to justice, but they have alienated so many others who were previously peaceful, that more terrorism occurs.
One very significant point is the depleted uranium in Iraq.
The radiation from the DU shells is causing so much pain and anguish to Iraqis that many of them know they are doomed to die from the cancers thy have caught from the radiation.
So, in order to get rid of the pain, they don't mind killing themselves, and may as well take some of those whom they see responsible with them.
This is why there are so many suicide bombers - because so many people are affected by radiation from the DU weapons, including American soldiers.

Depleted uranium video
http://elequity.com/du/DU.swf

Depleted Uranium - Far Worse Than 9/11
For hundreds of years to come, the effects of the uranium will continue to wreak ... "American forces admit to using over 300 tons of DU weapons in 1991. ...
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20060503&articleId=2374

2006-09-26 22:40:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Terror is a tactic, one cannot have a war on it. It's a sham, a 1984-esque theft of our freedoms and national unity. Imagine if, after Pearl Harbor, Roosevelt had declared war on "surprise air attacks." It's absurd.

2006-09-24 23:30:18 · answer #4 · answered by cassandra 6 · 1 1

New report says the Iraq war made the terror threat to the US WORSE. Way to go, Bush.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/09/24/iraq.main/index.html

2006-09-24 23:36:26 · answer #5 · answered by Phil S 5 · 0 1

bin laden doesn't matter much except as a symbol

2006-09-24 23:28:02 · answer #6 · answered by Brand X 6 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers