that clinton over and over told wallace to read clarkes book for the complete story. but after the interview when wallace and his faux robots all agreed clinton hates america, that wallace chose to use clarkes quotes from various interviews.......not from his book which is exactly where clinton told him to go for the facts....
why not go to the book?....because in interviews its easier to take something out of context and support the stupid notion that clinton did nothing to get bin laden.
proof yet again, faux news is a joke.
2006-09-24 15:37:44 · 6 answers · asked by bush-deathgrip 1 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
Faux is a joke for the American viewing pleasure like Comedy Central is. Clinton is the one America was listening to not Chris Wallace.
2006-09-26 06:35:13 · answer #1 · answered by Kemo Sahbe 2 · 9⤊ 1⤋
Wallace falsely accused Clinton of screwing up the operation to kill Bin Laden and implied that he didn't do enough. Clinton, quite rightly, got angry and gave Wallace a dose of reality. I would get angry too. Why should he be blamed for everything? Wallace was shockingly biased and prejudiced as an interviewer. Wallace got what he deserved !!!
Wallace is also a total has been , this was his first major interview with someone with relevance to the world in years, He had to cook up something controversial,
Wallace is the joke, He is a complete utter joke himself,
Seems like Wallace has a lot of reading to do now , doesn't he!
2006-09-24 22:40:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
If you have read Clarke's book you would know that "he" Richard Clarke does not support all that Slick Willy stated so glowingly about his actions re: terror!
He in fact, confirmed in "his book" that Slick Willy conducted policy based on Polls continually. The "Wag the Dog" tactic was exactly correct and Slick Willy in his abhorrent behavior during that interview revealed for he world to see just how really sensitive to exposure on this horrific issue he truly is and the impact it has on his "legacy" (?)
Slick Willy is sooooo desperately trying to polish his legacy with his $$$ fund-raising efforts that he fails to realize that all he will berembered for is "cigars" and an intern named Monica.
He, "Slick Willy" is incapable of separating truth from his own delusional concepts of what his terror policy was!
He can be admired for only one thing truthful that he said in that devastating interview... "that he failed".
He was Commander in Chief and he failed.
2006-09-24 23:24:59 · answer #3 · answered by B'klyn Barracuda 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Faux News belongs in China or North Korea. They have no business calling themselves an American news channel.
2006-09-25 15:57:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clinton could not answer the questions himself so he kept referring to the book. When he didn't refer to the book he lied. In his own biography he admits that he learned to lie as a child as a defense mechanism. Seems like it has served him well but he cannot fool everyone and in my opinion that made him a faux president.
2006-09-24 22:54:54 · answer #5 · answered by Heidi 4 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
So much for the so called liberal media
2006-09-24 22:45:28 · answer #6 · answered by doggiebike 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋