English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

aftter Micheal Moores film, or after being called the devil by a foriegn leader, or after being attacked by Clinton on Fox News Sunday.

Clinton pointed his finger, bugged his eyes, got very angry, tapped the notebook on the interviewers lap, and started attacking conservatives and Chris Wallace ( who asks very tough questions to conservatives and republicans as well, just look at his transcripts )

Bush didn't respond to most of the attacks. He responded to Clinton's remarks by saying he and Clinton had different ways to fighting terror. He said alot of the attacks on him were not helpful.

2006-09-24 15:23:56 · 16 answers · asked by lend322 4 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

16 answers

President Bush reacted in a civilized, stately manner, without casting any aspersions or recrimination.

Former President Clinton reacted like a kindergartner.

Which is best? Well kindergartners are kinda cute, but a grown man acting like one is somewhat pathetic.

2006-09-24 15:31:44 · answer #1 · answered by danny_boy_jones 5 · 1 3

It was embarassing the way Clinton behaved. I am not a Bush fan but that doesn't excuse President Clinton in anyway for acting like a two year old.

I am a Democrat and voted for Bill Clinton twice. I would not go back and change my votes. But if he were to run for election again I would have second thoughts. He seemed emotionally disturbed and unstable. This tirade means I will not consider voting for Hillary. I think she is is "no Bill Clinton" to start with but now knowing that she would have an unstable partner it would be devastating to our country to have her in the Whitehouse.

I am no great fan of Fox news but Chris Wallace is trully a "fair" interviewer and did not deserve the abuse that President Clinton laid on him.

It looks to me like President Clinton will go the Carter way. He will do great things in the charity realm but will never be considered stable when speaking in public on other issues.

2006-09-26 02:45:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I agree. Bush is much more of a class act. He knows we'll find out the truth eventually, so he doesn't have to say much. Clinton is such a redneck hillbilly, it's hilarious to watch him turn red and point fingers at the screen, while lying his fat *** off. What makes it the funniest is that we all know he's lying. He knows it too, but that doesn't stop him. It's really fun to watch him when you know he's telling more fibs. He'd lie if telling the truth would help him. Now he's trying to say he didn't just ignore all the terrorist attacks of the 90's. What a goof !!!

Bubbah still cracks me up !!! I kinda miss him. By far the funniest president we ever had. Sort of the Barney Fife of the US presidency.

I don't mean to imply that having a buffoon like Clinton in office is a good thing. Afterall, we're still paying for his incompetence, but you have to admit it was a lot of fun to watch his juvenile behavior.

2006-09-24 15:44:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous 7 · 1 1

If Clinton is so tough let him go on O'Reilly. I don't think O'Reilly would let him wag his finger in his face, Clinton is lucky Wallace is such a small guy, after seeing this interview I really see how some of these women Clinton had affairs with were afraid of him.

2006-09-25 03:53:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

A previous poster said Clinton was 'awesome'? He looks like an angry child--pointing his finger, poking Chris Wallace, calling him names, blaming it all on the 'neo-cons' and right wing 'conspiracy'. Seriously, he's been smoking too much dope--he is paranoid! He never stops lying and we all know it! His best line when speaking of Rove was, "If it works, keep doing it". Must be Clinton's motto, because he knows he is charming and charismatic and a great speaker, (and liar) so the libs will forgive every lie he has ever told--because what does "is" mean anyway!

GW--behaved like a gentlemanly statesman. He doesn't dignify BS with comments.

2006-09-25 04:01:19 · answer #5 · answered by Cherie 6 · 0 1

Clinton stated facts about the CIA and FBI which stopped him from going after al-quida. The CIA and FBI were re-organized after 9/11, and now where is al-quida? Its everywhere. Bush is 7x tougher on oil rich Iraq, even though it had nothing to do with 9/11, it had nothing to do with the Cole, or other terrorists plots. I deduce from troop commitment alone that BUSH is soft on TERROR and loves Iraqi oil.

2006-09-26 14:27:33 · answer #6 · answered by MarshaMarsha 3 · 0 0

everybody knows that fox news is a conservative network. as far as clinton and bush go, i think clinton did a better job than bush times 10, but the point i want to make is who cares who did or didn't do what?? we're so busy looking for someone in this country to blame that we've lost sight of who's really to blame which is al queda and bin laden. why don't we start blaming them for a change instead of playing the partisanship card.

2006-09-24 15:36:34 · answer #7 · answered by cwilson_192002 2 · 1 1

Obama has greater conserved demeanor, yet it rather is not any longer significant right here. i individually supply invoice Clinton dissimilar credit for that interview. I applaud him for safeguarding himself against bogus assaults from Wallace and Fox that could desire to be directed on the Bush administration. They tried to blame invoice Clinton for 9-11, whilst it replaced into Bush who disregarded the August 2001 checklist entitled "Bin weighted down desperate to attack in the U.S", a checklist given to Bush on the same time as he replaced into on holiday i could upload. It replaced into Bush who did no longer carry a unmarried assembly on terrorism from inauguration day till 9-11. It replaced into Bush who denied the validity of the N.I.E checklist from Hans Blix and the Un weapons inspectors. It replaced into Bush who had a protracted-lasting employer dating with the Saudi Bin Ladens. I firmly help invoice Clinton in that interview. Chris Wallace and the entire Fox information community have no pertaining to my political ideals. yet to respond to your question, Obama is plenty greater powerful at bridging the divide between the events. yet, i do no longer choose Chris Wallace or the different republican at Fox to tell me that.

2016-12-12 14:28:14 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I'm watching the interview right now & Clinton is Awesome!
It's about time someone stood up to Fox & Bill is doing
an excellent job.
It's about time the truth came out.

To the poster who put me down - bush act like a gentleman?
He's incapable of speaking proper English & chews his food
on camera - eecchhh.

2006-09-24 15:28:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

The truth is never helpful to propagandists like gw. Not that Clinton was an angel, but he was/ is far more intelligent and World Wise than the village idiot from TX could ever hope to be.

2006-09-24 15:29:34 · answer #10 · answered by Kevin O 2 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers