The levels of CO2 in the air is measurably higher. We must study means to prevent a catastrophic change to our atmosphere and climate. We just don't know how long or how much trouble that we are in. Certainly, 50 more years of what we are doing not might NOT make the difference. But 50 years of trying to do better might prevent an irreversible trend.
We currently can't control our economy, a totally man-made product. We can't let pollution and the build-up of green-house gasses build up. Should we experiment on our planet and fail?
I have to let you know that I am not a liberal in these matters. I have considered buying a Hybrid Car to get 50MPG; but that could also save me MONEY. I have insulated my home, and replaced the furnace with higher efficiency. These things do benefit me.
2006-09-24 14:46:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
"is this yet another nail contained in the denial coffin?" No, it really is extra of an attempt to get rid of a nail from the hotter coffin. My in demand line in that article: "of their study, the researchers tweaked the parameters that impression 3 aspects contained in the type: the sensitivity of climate to ameliorations contained in the most purpose of carbon dioxide contained in the ambience, ..." "All fashions are fake yet some fashions are functional." -George E. P. field _______________________________________... Edit@boost: "the element about computing gadget fashions is the guidelines of chance dictate there is an equivalent danger they'd be incorrect in both route" sure, which will be real if the elements modelers were randomly figuring out on enter parameters and by no skill rejecting any output runs. Are you implying it really is what they are doing? _______________________________________... Edit2: Freeman Dyson sums this up fairly nicely right here: "My first heresy says that each and each of the fuss about international warming is grossly exaggerated. right here i'm opposing the holy brotherhood of climate type experts and the gang of deluded voters who trust the numbers envisioned through the computing gadget fashions. of route, they are declaring, I even don't have any degree in meteorology and that i'm for this reason no longer qualified to speak. yet I have studied the elements fashions and that i understand what they could do. The fashions clean up the equations of fluid dynamics, and they do an fairly sturdy pastime of describing the fluid motions of the ambience and the oceans. They do an fairly undesirable pastime of describing the clouds, the airborne dirt and mud, the chemistry and the biology of fields and farms and forests. they do no longer start up to describe the genuine international that we stay in. the genuine international is muddy and messy and finished of issues that we do not yet comprehend. it really is a lot extra straightforward for a scientist to take a seat in an air-conditioned progression and run computing gadget fashions, than to placed on wintry climate outfits and degree what's somewhat occurring outdoors contained in the swamps and the clouds. it somewhat is why the elements type experts finally end up believing their own fashions." - Freeman Dyson (2007) "Heretical ideas about technology and Society", area, August 8, 2007 _______________________________________... Edit3: “The climate gadget is a coupled non-linear chaotic gadget, and for this reason the lengthy-time period prediction of destiny climate states isn't conceivable.” – IPCC 2001 TAR (pg 771)
2016-11-23 19:55:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by gerdsen 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, global warming is a myth. You keep believing that. Just don't forget to throw away your thermometer, your memory of the seasons, and your common sense.
2006-09-24 15:04:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by democracynow 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't think it's a myth after all the computer is based on true facts.
2006-09-24 14:35:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by TaMcCartney 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
The safety, design and maintenance of aeroplanes, all modern buildings, bridges, cars and other items too numerous to mention in our daily lives are also based on computer models. Do you doubt the validity of these items as well?
2006-09-24 14:43:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anchor Cranker 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
Global warming is a serious problem. polar bears are being found dead in the ocean because the ice is retreating. 3 new islands in the arctic ocean have bean discovered that WERE!! covered with ice! It is beginning to take its toll on us. buy a hybrid instead of any other gas guzzling vehicle, they get 49 miles to the gallon!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-09-24 14:40:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
mmmm, that's an interesting one.... tell that to all the sea life whose habitats are being ruined by seas getting warmer and the multitude of people left homeless after freak floods and weather conditions...... not based on any model I know
2006-09-28 00:44:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by talia 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
"Surely" animals are dying...the oceans are expanding....the forests are dwindling.
That's real and happening all the time not computer simulation.
It's true this did happen once before but it was before the earth was populated with people.
2006-09-24 14:57:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by daljack -a girl 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Tell that to the dying polar bears in Canada
2006-09-24 14:49:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by Snowth 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Not a myth just reality.
2006-09-24 14:41:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋