-such as Clinton has ? The man can not handle the truth ( as is abundltly clear in the Chris Wallace interview ). How can anyone expect him to know fact from fiction ? Did he or did he not refuse to take Osama bin laden off the hands of the Sudanese , who were trying to unload him on Clinton ? How is that even remotely close to being the closest to killing bin laden-such as Slick Willy claims ???
2006-09-24 14:05:40 · 17 answers · asked by missmayzie 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Veda - thanks for the question, it needs to be asked regularly.
I have never believed from the point when all the sex scandals started during his first run for pres. There is an old saying when there is "enough" smoke there is fire, or maybe if it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, its a duck
and clitoon is definitely one lying fool, and he tells really big ones. I think he does it because he has been able to get away with it. Did you notice how upset he was about being sworn in, all of sudden his legal education kicked in and he thought he would just parse his way around everything.
The man is a narcissist and his wife is actually much worse, he is the front of the house showman and she is behind the curtain pushing the buttons, never forget that, she is much worse than slick willy.
I think you have to put this all into perspective. Today there is a fairly large amount of people that are extremely shook up about 911 and people going to nuke us and so forth, this is a reality they do not want to accept. To alter this they have transferred their hate to one man so in their reality they are once again in control. It is a psychosis and it is going to get much worse because the person they have transferred their hate to is going to be leaving office and the reality they seek to avoid is going to still be there. My guess is if you could go long on psychiatrists it would be a great beat in 2009 cause there are going to be a fair amount of paranoids running around without someone to hate or fear.
2006-09-30 11:47:33 · answer #1 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
As opposed to who? Someone that used the deaths of 3,000 people to invade a country that had nothing to do with anything other than the leader threatening to kill his father? Or someone that sends soldiers off to fight in a war with no basis against fanatics on their own turf? Or someone that doesn't have the balls or the intelligence to admit when he has done something wrong, instead blaming some other person that never agreed with him in the first place - like a former Secretary of State? Or someone that has no idea on how to manage anything, and allows hundreds of people to die from a natural disaster that could have been helped if he might have done something besides continue the vacation he was on?
Yeah - give me the man that got caught screwing an intern and then lied about it over a man that has lies killing thousands. I don't think that Clinton's lies have killed more soldiers than all of the other wars in this nation's history combined.
And I thought that Clinton made an interesting point: The right wingers kept saying he was obsessed with Bin Laden when he wanted to get him. And when he left office, he warned the incoming administration to watch out for Bin Laden (something he didn't have to do, but did anyways). Yeah, we saw how much good all of that did, didn't we.
I don't think you can lay blame at anyone's feet, unless you would like to travel back to Reagan - remember the whole selling the arms to terrorists? You think that OBL is giving his guys guns that were bought from Ollie North??? Good question deserving of an answer. If you think the Contras were the only ones getting those arms, you're naive. Contras need money as well as arms - what is to prevent them from selling those guns and stuff to others? So why not look at the origin? Don't lay blame. OBL was going to do something - regardless of who was in office and what was done. The determined always find a way to carry out their mission.
To Leogirl08: You won't get rid of the "disease" if you keep scratching open the sores. Leave them alone, and they go away.
2006-09-24 14:30:31 · answer #2 · answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Good question.
I'd offer an equally good question: Why believe a president who lied to an entire country about reasons for war, and have that lie cause the deaths of thousands of innocent people?
And while we are at it, why believe a president who spies on his own country, and holds people in prison without charging them with a crime. I mean, with such blatant disregard for the laws of this country, how can we trust anything he says?
2006-09-24 14:10:09 · answer #3 · answered by Mr. Pink 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
He would nicely be the only President( in modern historic previous )to really have the braveness to seem in courtroom,and answer questions ,lower than OATH, which may clarify the repetitive "govt Privilege" use of this administration. worry and cowardice require particular defenses,it would look..!
2016-11-23 19:53:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is hard to believe any politician especially BJ Clinton. Most politicians will tell you what you want to hear. It is up to you to decide which one who can believe the most.
2006-09-24 14:09:34 · answer #5 · answered by Jean R 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
nice try volleyball but why were those missiles launched the same day Monica L. was testifying before the grand jury.
wag wag wag that dog
2006-09-26 11:42:25 · answer #6 · answered by skihill 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What amazes me as that the idiots out there that think this was all about a BJ. Clinton is like herpes, it's a disease we seem to not rid this country of.
2006-09-24 14:16:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
it's better to have tried and failed than to have never tried at all,,, Bush wanted Saddam,, he forgot about Osama bin Laden wanting to attack America,, he took his eye off the ball,, he failed to keep the USA on track and safe,, his invasion of Iraq has failed,,, when will George W. Bush start admitting that his failures,, can he not count that high
2006-09-24 14:13:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
If your biggest presidential gripe is perjury in a civil suit and a BJ, then you need to open your eyes to the real world, not just what Rush and your preacher tell you to think.
2006-09-24 14:16:08 · answer #9 · answered by Catspaw 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
boy that REALLY builds the case against Bush if that flew
Bush if compared has done far worse and hurt the whole world not just the Oval office with his philandering and pimping
Bush needs to be impeached so we can get back to our way of life....
Long live the US Empire of Domination and Globalization
2006-09-24 14:09:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋