English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

There was this lady with a poor family. She loved her parents and siblings, and the short-cut to give her family a nice house and a better living was to marry a guy who was 12 years older than her and who had a family that could provide to this lady much of the stuff she wanted, eg. money to build a house for her parents and of course other material stuff as well. A few years later, she found that she married the wrong guy because the guy's family could no longer give to her what she wanted. In addition, the guy that she married was not making enough money to support his own family. She ended up divorcing him and married another guy because the other guy was more capable and had a very well-paid job. Now, there are two questions here. Was she right on marrying this first guy for his family's money? And was she right on divorcing him?

2006-09-24 12:41:26 · 13 answers · asked by BusyBee 1 in Family & Relationships Marriage & Divorce

13 answers

Well his money built her a house, at least she got a house, she probably robbed him of so much that its no wonder he couldnt support his family...although why would he still need to support his family if he was married with his own family....that part doesnt make sense.

She sounds like a bit of a shark. She did the right thing in divorcing him simply because it will allow him to find someone who really loves him for himself....she did him a favour.

Its the new husband who is going to pay the penalty this time...although when he runs out of money, she will divorce him too.

She will get old one day, she will lose her looks and no man, money or not will want to get involved with her. You can only treat people badly for so long then it will come back and hit you in the face. She will end up a very lonely old woman....She may have a nice house and all the material possessions in the world but she wont have anyone who loves her to share it with.

2006-09-24 13:01:56 · answer #1 · answered by rightio 6 · 0 0

HMMMMMMMM....
Got me thinking about this. Well if she married in the first place for the money and it was no longer there then i see why she would divorce him when the money was not there. To remarry for the same reason she will do again if the money is not there. But i think that she will get hers in the end when the time is right. Everyone gets their wrong doing back at one point or another.

2006-09-24 15:19:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

A smart woman, will marry someone not only that she loves, but that can financially take care of her.. but to marry just for money is wrong, and to leave ur husband just because he doesnt have money is wrong.. For better or worse, for richer or poorer.. is what ur wedding vows state... Now there are times that a woman will feel the necessity to leave a man for financial reasons.. reasons beyond her heart.. to save her children for example from sinking in a financial hole.. because she fears for their well being.. but to leave because a man cant afford her extended family (parents,siblings) is wrong..

2006-09-24 12:47:14 · answer #3 · answered by brwneyedgrl 7 · 1 1

If the older man knew that was the reason that she was going to marry him and he consented then I guess it was alright. But when he wasn't doing so well and was having problems I think she was very wrong in divorcing him and not sticking by him as he stuck by her when she needed it.

2006-09-24 13:39:19 · answer #4 · answered by Maggie 5 · 0 0

She was right in marrying the first guy but she should not have divorced him. She should stick to her marriage vows.

2006-09-25 05:13:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well, it's only wrong if she married the men on false pretenses. If she didn't love the men and let them know that although she cared for them, she didn't love them and was only agreeing to marry them for the money, then no, it's not wrong.

2006-09-24 12:48:41 · answer #6 · answered by THP 3 · 1 1

it really is common for married women human beings to make a contribution to the sequence at church, it really is component of giving again to the church, non secular human beings have a tendency to purpose this as helping the church, the money will flow to inspite of the church needs it for. of route there has a tendency to be particular collections for different such issues as classes for the church for possibly having a set for church progression fund.

2016-11-23 19:45:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I have a pity for that poor man to be cheaten by that gold digger

2006-09-24 13:19:32 · answer #8 · answered by Neighbour 5 · 0 0

no she is a gold digger I understand her problems but everyone has problems money or not and she will never be happy with a man she doesn't love

2006-09-24 13:15:36 · answer #9 · answered by freckleface 4 · 0 0

this is a stupid question. of course you don't marry for money. money can't buy happiness. if you need nice things then go out and ge it yourself.

2006-09-24 13:06:50 · answer #10 · answered by hddiddle 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers