Given that there are 43,560 ft^2 in an acre, then 102 acres is
4,443,120 ft^2 which 22.22 times as much 200,000 ft^2.
By the way , that's based on a survey acre. There's something else called the commercial acre and it's 36,000 ft^2.
There's even an Ireland acre which is 70,557.432781532ft^2.
-v4m
And if you have a conversion question on just about anything
try this sight.
www.onlineconversion.com
2006-09-24 12:17:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by albert 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I acre is about 40,00 ft and 40,000 times 102 equals about 4080000sq ft so 102 acres is bigger than 200 sq feet
2006-09-24 19:02:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by hahahaha 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
the acres are bigger as 5 acres will exceed your 200,000 square ft
2006-09-24 19:07:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by The Must know man 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
102 acres is humongously larger. There are 43,560 feet in an acre. (If I remember correctly from my Real Estate Exam!)
2006-09-24 19:06:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sleek 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
102 acres is way way bigger. One acre is the same as like 60,000 sq ft.
2006-09-24 19:00:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by mojo2093@sbcglobal.net 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
102 acres is larger and is equal to 4,443,120 square feet.
2006-09-24 19:13:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by croc hunter fan 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
an acre is 43,560 sf. so 200,000 is like 4 1/2 acres.
2006-09-24 19:02:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by zocko 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
how many hectare are in this querry
2006-09-24 23:11:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by gussie r 3
·
0⤊
0⤋